On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 20:43, Peter Münster wrote:
> On Thu, 14 May 2009, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
>> Peter, may I ask you to recompile the luatex beta binary (in
>> src/luatex) and commit it to current/luatex-0.40.1/luatex?
>
> Of course. Compilation has just been started.
Thanks,
Mojca
__
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Peter, may I ask you to recompile the luatex beta binary (in
> src/luatex) and commit it to current/luatex-0.40.1/luatex?
Of course. Compilation has just been started.
Cheers, Peter
--
Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
__
bbvo...@home.nl wrote:
On Thursday 14 May 2009, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
It should, yes. Even better would be if you then sent your binary
to Mojca, since yours will run on more platforms than the current
binary in minimals.
Absolutely, and, even better, Bernard, if you're willing to use SVN,
On Thursday 14 May 2009, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> bbvo...@home.nl wrote:
> >> This means the 64bit binary is too new for your machine :(
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > 3 months after release and Debian Lenny is already too old.
>
> If it was any other distro I would be surprised ;)
> Lenny is glibc 2.7, ri
On Thursday 14 May 2009, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
> > It should, yes. Even better would be if you then sent your binary
> > to Mojca, since yours will run on more platforms than the current
> > binary in minimals.
>
> Absolutely, and, even better, Bernard, if you're willing to use SVN,
> you can
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 17:21, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
>> It should, yes. Even better would be if you then sent your binary
>> to Mojca, since yours will run on more platforms than the current
>> binary in minimals.
>
> Absolutely, and, even better, Bernard, if you're willing to use SVN,
> you ca
> It should, yes. Even better would be if you then sent your binary
> to Mojca, since yours will run on more platforms than the current
> binary in minimals.
Absolutely, and, even better, Bernard, if you're willing to use SVN,
you can even submit the binaries to the repository yourself. Write t
bbvo...@home.nl wrote:
>> This means the 64bit binary is too new for your machine :(
> Thanks.
>
> 3 months after release and Debian Lenny is already too old.
If it was any other distro I would be surprised ;)
Lenny is glibc 2.7, right?
> Compiling luatex myself and updating minimals, does t
On Thursday 14 May 2009, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> bbvo...@home.nl wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Updating context (linux-64) gives:
> >
> > texlua: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.8' not found (required by
> > texlua)
>
> This means the 64bit binary is too new for your machine :(
Thanks.
3 months
bbvo...@home.nl wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Updating context (linux-64) gives:
>
> texlua: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.8' not found (required by texlua)
This means the 64bit binary is too new for your machine :(
Dear all,
Updating context (linux-64) gives:
texlua: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.8' not found (required by texlua)
The 32bit version works fine with glibc2.6.
Regards,
Bernard
___
If your question is of
11 matches
Mail list logo