On Monday 11 May 2009 20:16:11 Aditya Mahajan wrote:
I would also use \implies instead of \Rightarrow (slightly different
spacing).
! Undefined control sequence.
recently read \implies
$\to$
\usemodule[math-ams]
En/na Olivier ha escrit:
Hi Xan,
For example, what is the equivalent of:
\begin{equation*}
\left.\begin{aligned}
2^2 | n_0\\
4^2 | n_0 + 2 \Rightarrow (2^2)^2 | n_0 +2 \Rightarrow 2^2 | n_0 +2
\text{ ya que } 2^2 | (2^2)^2
\end{aligned}\right\} \Rightarrow 2^2 | (n_0 + 2 - n_0)
Hi,
I read the document Using \startalign and friends of Aditya (that it's
good) and I can't find anything under ams aligned. Is this an equivalent
in ConText?
For example, what is the equivalent of:
\begin{equation*}
\left.\begin{aligned}
2^2 | n_0\\
4^2 | n_0 + 2 \Rightarrow (2^2)^2 |
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Xan wrote:
Hi,
I read the document Using \startalign and friends of Aditya (that it's
good) and I can't find anything under ams aligned. Is this an equivalent in
ConText?
Strictly speaking, none. You can fake aligned and gathered with matrices.
For example, what is
