Re: [NTG-context] XML in latest betas (MkIV & LMTX)

2019-06-02 Thread Hans Hagen
On 6/2/2019 3:07 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Font expansion (as reported in https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2019/095175.html). font expansion is always slower (but i admit that i never use it) Hans -

Re: [NTG-context] XML in latest betas (MkIV & LMTX)

2019-06-02 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 6/2/19 2:12 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 6/2/2019 1:17 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> [...] >> Compiling exactly the same XML sources (a book on ConTeXt in Spanish), >> MkIV needs 40s and LMTX more than 52s. > > Hm. Is that the first time you compare a MKIV runs with an LMTX run for > that

Re: [NTG-context] XML in latest betas (MkIV & LMTX)

2019-06-02 Thread Hans Hagen
On 6/2/2019 1:17 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Dear list, I have just installed latest betas for both MkIV and LMTX. Compiling exactly the same XML sources (a book on ConTeXt in Spanish), MkIV needs 40s and LMTX more than 52s. Hm. Is that the first time you compare a MKIV runs with an LMTX run

[NTG-context] XML in latest betas (MkIV & LMTX)

2019-06-02 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
Dear list, I have just installed latest betas for both MkIV and LMTX. Compiling exactly the same XML sources (a book on ConTeXt in Spanish), MkIV needs 40s and LMTX more than 52s. This is the first time I get such a difference in compilation times. I’m afraid I can’t be sure that output is the