Re: [NTG-context] answers (cumulative reply :)

2009-11-01 Thread Hans Hagen
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote: Thank you, friends, for answers. To Hahns: Can I make $$ envinroment behave like \startformula? In other words, to no redefine $$ to be substituted by \start-stop formula? Writing \startformula and \stopformula every time is too verbose. well, time spent on m

Re: [NTG-context] answers (cumulative reply :)

2009-11-01 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 18:08, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote: > Thank you, friends, for answers. > > To Mojca: > OK, the current solution works for me. Don't want to complicate it further, > just want to point out that Knuth compatibility is broken :) I don't think so. You probably didn't get any ou

Re: [NTG-context] answers (cumulative reply :)

2009-11-01 Thread Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky
Thank you, friends, for answers. To Hahns: Can I make $$ envinroment behave like \startformula? In other words, to redefine $$ to be substituted by \start-stop formula? Writing \startformula and \stopformula every time is too verbose. To Mojca: OK, the current solution works for me. Don't wan