On 2011-03-25 Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 25-3-2011 9:16, Marco wrote:
> > On 2011-03-25 Hans Hagen wrote:
> >
> and then remake the format and try again? I want to know what gets
> reported there
> >>>
> >>> table: a6330d0 110400 1254938640 110400 1254938640
> >>
> >> weird, what
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 23:01, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 25-3-2011 10:56, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
>> Waiting for Taco to release it. I don't have a good feeling taking
>> some random snapshot from repository.
>
> I've been using it for quite a while now so 0.66 is quite ok,
I'm not trying to say that
On 03/25/2011 11:01 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 25-3-2011 10:56, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 22:39, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 25-3-2011 10:08, Marco wrote:
No problem with luatex version beta-0.66.0-2011032521 (rev 4093). But
minimals still ship beta-0.65.0-2010121317.
Is there a
On 25-3-2011 10:56, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 22:39, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 25-3-2011 10:08, Marco wrote:
No problem with luatex version beta-0.66.0-2011032521 (rev 4093). But
minimals still ship beta-0.65.0-2010121317.
Is there a reason why the minimals don't ship 0.66?
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 22:39, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 25-3-2011 10:08, Marco wrote:
>
>> No problem with luatex version beta-0.66.0-2011032521 (rev 4093). But
>> minimals still ship beta-0.65.0-2010121317.
>
> Is there a reason why the minimals don't ship 0.66?
Waiting for Taco to release it. I d
On 25-3-2011 10:08, Marco wrote:
On 2011-03-25 Hans Hagen wrote:
No problem with luatex version beta-0.66.0-2011032521 (rev 4093). But
minimals still ship beta-0.65.0-2010121317.
I'm not sure if it's a bug in luatex 0.65 or context 2011.03.25.
I have no clue either. Is there a reason why the
On 25-3-2011 9:16, Marco wrote:
On 2011-03-25 Hans Hagen wrote:
and then remake the format and try again? I want to know what gets
reported there
table: a6330d0 110400 1254938640 110400 1254938640
weird, what font is that?
How to obtain that information? These numbers tell me no
On 2011-03-25 Hans Hagen wrote:
No problem with luatex version beta-0.66.0-2011032521 (rev 4093). But
minimals still ship beta-0.65.0-2010121317.
I'm not sure if it's a bug in luatex 0.65 or context 2011.03.25.
Marco
___
On 2011-03-25 Hans Hagen wrote:
> >> and then remake the format and try again? I want to know what gets
> >> reported there
> >
> > table: a6330d0 110400 1254938640 110400 1254938640
>
> weird, what font is that?
How to obtain that information? These numbers tell me nothing.
Marco
On 25-3-2011 7:58, Marco wrote:
On 2011-03-25 Hans Hagen wrote:
weird ...
in font-otp.lua there is in line 347:
This line is in font-otf.lua. I added it there.
local reload = not data or data.size ~= size or data.time ~= time
can you add there
print(data,data and data.size,data a
On 2011-03-25 Hans Hagen wrote:
> weird ...
>
>
> in font-otp.lua there is in line 347:
This line is in font-otf.lua. I added it there.
> local reload = not data or data.size ~= size or data.time ~= time
>
> can you add there
>
> print(data,data and data.size,data and data.time,size,ti
On 25-3-2011 7:28, Reviczky, Adam wrote:
I'm getting this since today morning:
i uploaded a patch
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlan
I'm getting this since today morning:
mtx-context | run 1: luatex
--fmt="/home/08/reviczky/local32/texlive/experimental/tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache/context/5fe67e0bfe781ce0dde776fb1556f32e/formats/cont-en"
--lua="/home/08/reviczky/local32/texlive/experimental/tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache/c
On 25-3-2011 7:06, Marco wrote:
On 2011-03-25 Hans Hagen wrote:
Hi,
I uploaded a new beta. There are quite some changes this time:
The following doesn't compile:
\starttext
\input knuth
\stoptext
Output:
weird ...
in font-otp.lua there is in line 347:
local reload = not data or d
On 2011-03-25 Hans Hagen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I uploaded a new beta. There are quite some changes this time:
The following doesn't compile:
\starttext
\input knuth
\stoptext
Output:
! LuaTeX error ...text/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/font-otp.lua:358:
attempt to index local 'resources' (a
> The latest mtxrun (on both pragma-ade and in minimals) does not contain
> any 'v' on line 8736, so something must have gone wrong in the local
> update process.
Yes, it turned out a syncronization issue. For some reason I got old stuff in
the texmf-osx-intel/bin until two days ago when updating
On 10/23/2010 02:33 PM, Oliver Buerschaper wrote:
today's beta yields the following console output:
---
/usr/texbin/mtxrun:8736: attempt to concatenate local 'v' (a table value)
---
The exact problem persists on my machine (Mac OS 10.6.4) after updating the
minimals to 2010.10.22 16:46 beta :
> today's beta yields the following console output:
>
> ---
> /usr/texbin/mtxrun:8736: attempt to concatenate local 'v' (a table value)
> ---
The exact problem persists on my machine (Mac OS 10.6.4) after updating the
minimals to 2010.10.22 16:46 beta :-(
Can anyone else reproduce this?
Oliver
> Do you want to say that you are trying to revive your "ConTeXt
> Minimals for Mac" project? Else mtxrun should probably not come from
> /usr/texbin.
I deny everything.
(Reusing a recent quote :-)
Oliver
___
If your
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 17:38, Oliver Buerschaper wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> today's beta yields the following console output:
>
> ---
> /usr/texbin/mtxrun:8736: attempt to concatenate local 'v' (a table value)
Oliver,
Do you want to say that you are trying to revive your "ConTeXt
Minimals for Mac" p
Dear all,
today's beta yields the following console output:
---
/usr/texbin/mtxrun:8736: attempt to concatenate local 'v' (a table value)
---
:-(
Best,
Oliver
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, p
21 matches
Mail list logo
