On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Hans van der Meer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wolfgang,
From your observation I am inclined to guess that the \ifx falls prey
to the collection of arguments. The \relax can be replaced by an extra
pair {} behind the description: \answerblock{}{}% also typesets
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Hans van der Meer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is the following problem on code that did work around july 2007,
but no longer under the current context version (2008-03-11).
Define a description, I did:
\definedescription[answerblock][%
Wolfgang,
From your observation I am inclined to guess that the \ifx falls prey
to the collection of arguments. The \relax can be replaced by an extra
pair {} behind the description: \answerblock{}{}% also typesets
without the if-error.
I more or less conclude that the lookahead from
Hans van der Meer wrote:
After some detective work in which Wolfgang Schuster had a large share
and has found the most elegant workaround, the addition of a \relax
just after the description call prevents the error:
\def\shortanswer#1\par{%
\par % be sure to end paragraph here
Hans van der Meer wrote:
I more or less conclude that the lookahead from \dodoublegroupempty
does not stop on the \if. If I remember correctly, that behaviour is
to be expected from tex and the prospects for solving it generically
within the format bleak. If Hans Hagen is listening, can
There is the following problem on code that did work around july 2007,
but no longer under the current context version (2008-03-11).
Define a description, I did:
\definedescription[answerblock][%
\c!margin=\v!no,\c!location=\v!left,%
