On 23 Dec 2008, at 04:26, Yue Wang wrote:
Hi, all.
I expect different output in xetex and luatex using context. and I
think the problem is quite serious although I do not speak Turkish.
in turkish, fi can not be treat as ligatures and I can see luatex
handle that quite well. however, in xetex,
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote:
On 23 Dec 2008, at 04:26, Yue Wang wrote:
Hi, all.
I expect different output in xetex and luatex using context. and I
think the problem is quite serious although I do not speak Turkish.
in turkish, fi can not be treat as ligatures and I
Hi, Hans:
When trk is replaced by TRK it works OK in XeTeX.
Thanks! So I think we should support lowercase code for xetex as well
for api consistency?
LuaTeX/MKIV use lowercase labels.
Then we can get similar output using the same tex file.
Yue Wang
Hi, Jonathan:
Thanks for the analysis! Now I replace the trk with TRK, and xetex
output is right.
In the LuaTeX case, I don't think *any* ligatures are enabled by default, so
the language is irrelevant; notice that there's no ff ligature in your
output either, even though this should be
Hi, all.
I expect different output in xetex and luatex using context. and I
think the problem is quite serious although I do not speak Turkish.
in turkish, fi can not be treat as ligatures and I can see luatex
handle that quite well. however, in xetex, fi are treated as
ligatures.
I attach the
