Re: [NTG-context] emergency stretch not taken in account in some cases

2016-07-20 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
josephcan...@gmail.com 20. Juli 2016 um 20:48 I think I could figure out the reason of this problem. Actually emergency stretch is broken in all cases it seems. In luatex source code I see: source/texk/web2c/luatexdir/tex/commands.w: primitive_tex("emergency

Re: [NTG-context] emergency stretch not taken in account in some cases

2016-07-20 Thread josephcanedo
I think I could figure out the reason of this problem. Actually emergency stretch is broken in all cases it seems. In luatex source code I see: source/texk/web2c/luatexdir/tex/commands.w:primitive_tex("emergencystretch", assign_dimen_cmd, dimen_base + emergency_stretch_code, dimen_base);

Re: [NTG-context] emergency stretch not taken in account in some cases

2016-07-19 Thread josephcanedo
Thanks a lot Wolfgang for the simpler code, I’ll replace mine with your suggestion, in actual document the margins width are much larger and font smaller too. I use binaries on Win64 platform (installed using command line method: first-setup.bat --modules=all): $ ls -l $(which luatex.dll) -rw

Re: [NTG-context] emergency stretch not taken in account in some cases

2016-07-18 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
josephcan...@gmail.com 18. Juli 2016 um 23:21 Dear all, In some cases specifying \setupalign[stretch] does not seem to have any effect with latest betas (live, 2016.06.20 22:14 version are fine, but 2016.07.18 is not), and the output has now overfulls instead of

[NTG-context] emergency stretch not taken in account in some cases

2016-07-18 Thread josephcanedo
Dear all, In some cases specifying \setupalign[stretch] does not seem to have any effect with latest betas (live, 2016.06.20 22:14 version are fine, but 2016.07.18 is not), and the output has now overfulls instead of (admitedly a bit large) underfulls. Attached simple (albeit bit extreme) M