Am 17.04.2013 um 21:35 schrieb "Meer, H. van der" :
> A minor point perhaps on this textcommand= \groupedcommand for the marking of
> the notes in the text. I tried this but now the marking is not typeset as a
> superscript.
\defineprocessor[footnote][left={[},right={]}]
\defineconversionset[f
A minor point perhaps on this textcommand= \groupedcommand for the marking of
the notes in the text. I tried this but now the marking is not typeset as a
superscript.
Hans van der Meer
On 17 Apr 2013, at 9:28 PM, Hans Hagen
wrote:
> On 4/17/2013 8:27 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>>
>> Am
On 4/17/2013 8:27 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 17.04.2013 um 20:23 schrieb "Meer, H. van der" :
With the following setup my endnotes show up in the list with [number], as I
would like to have it. But in the text they do not appear as [number] but just
as plain numbers.
Why does textcomman
Am 17.04.2013 um 20:23 schrieb "Meer, H. van der" :
> With the following setup my endnotes show up in the list with [number], as I
> would like to have it. But in the text they do not appear as [number] but
> just as plain numbers.
> Why does textcommand has not this effect, whereas numbercomm
With the following setup my endnotes show up in the list with [number], as I
would like to have it. But in the text they do not appear as [number] but just
as plain numbers.
Why does textcommand has not this effect, whereas numbercommand does? The
manual strongly suggest this to me.
\def\fnmar
