On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> Hi minimalists,
>
> is there a reason why luatex in linux is still at version
> 0.28.0-2008071500?
There must have been some mistake made by accident and the version was
tagged as being 0.29, so it never got updated/recompiled.
I wanted
On Sep 29, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Yes, it is because 0.29.0 is somewhat broken (0.30.0 tomorrow).
>
> Best wishes,
> Taco
Ah OK! Thanks Taco, good luck with the next build!
Thomas
___
If your ques
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> Hi minimalists,
>
> is there a reason why luatex in linux is still at version
> 0.28.0-2008071500? On OS X, I now have 0.29.0-2008072211, and this
> seems the latest version on supelec as well.
Yes, it is because 0.29.0 is somewhat broken (0.30.0 tomorrow).
Best
Hi minimalists,
is there a reason why luatex in linux is still at version
0.28.0-2008071500? On OS X, I now have 0.29.0-2008072211, and this
seems the latest version on supelec as well.
All best
Thomas
___
If you