Re: [NTG-context] linux minimals

2008-09-29 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: > Hi minimalists, > > is there a reason why luatex in linux is still at version > 0.28.0-2008071500? There must have been some mistake made by accident and the version was tagged as being 0.29, so it never got updated/recompiled. I wanted

Re: [NTG-context] linux minimals

2008-09-29 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Sep 29, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > Yes, it is because 0.29.0 is somewhat broken (0.30.0 tomorrow). > > Best wishes, > Taco Ah OK! Thanks Taco, good luck with the next build! Thomas ___ If your ques

Re: [NTG-context] linux minimals

2008-09-29 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: > Hi minimalists, > > is there a reason why luatex in linux is still at version > 0.28.0-2008071500? On OS X, I now have 0.29.0-2008072211, and this > seems the latest version on supelec as well. Yes, it is because 0.29.0 is somewhat broken (0.30.0 tomorrow). Best

[NTG-context] linux minimals

2008-09-29 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
Hi minimalists, is there a reason why luatex in linux is still at version 0.28.0-2008071500? On OS X, I now have 0.29.0-2008072211, and this seems the latest version on supelec as well. All best Thomas ___ If you