Of these two variants the second works.
The first gives as error an old enemy: the \Umathquad error
% gives an error:
\startsetups[test]
$\displaystyle
a=1
$
\stopsetups
\setup[test]
\stoptext
% works:
\starttext
$$\displaylines{a=1\cr b+c+d=3\cr}$$
\stoptext
ConTeXt ver: 2012.01.16 18:33 MKIV
On 25-1-2012 17:29, Meer, H. van der wrote:
Of these two variants the second works.
The first gives as error an old enemy: the \Umathquad error
% gives an error:
\startsetups[test]
$\displaystyle
a=1
$
\stopsetups
\setup[test]
\stoptext
% works:
\starttext
$$\displaylines{a=1\cr b+c+d=3\cr}$$
Hallo,
the following example compiles ok
\starttext
\startformula
\frac{206}{7}=[29;2,2,1]
\stopformula
\stoptext
while this compiles not
\starttext
\startformula
[29;2,2,1]=\frac{206}{7}
\stopformula
\stoptext
Bug or user error?
Wolfgang
On 3/18/2010 4:15 PM, Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini wrote:
the following example compiles ok
\starttext
\startformula
\frac{206}{7}=[29;2,2,1]
\stopformula
\stoptext
while this compiles not
\starttext
\startformula
[29;2,2,1]=\frac{206}{7}
\stopformula
\stoptext
In context, commands accept
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Wolfgang Werners-Lucchini
w...@musensturm.de wrote:
Hallo,
the following example compiles ok
\starttext
\startformula
\frac{206}{7}=[29;2,2,1]
\stopformula
\stoptext
while this compiles not
\starttext
\startformula
[29;2,2,1]=\frac{206}{7}
Sorry, I found it!
\starttext
\startformula[]
[29;2,2,1]=\frac{206}{7}
\stopformula
\stoptext
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist :
