Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
>
./setuptex:149: unmatched "
>>> What does that mean? Does setuptex contain other bugs or is it only a
>>> shell problem?
>> Yes, this is a bug. I can't reproduce it here, maybe we should take
>> it offline.
>
> I can r
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
>>> ./setuptex:149: unmatched "
>>
>> What does that mean? Does setuptex contain other bugs or is it only a
>> shell problem?
>
> Yes, this is a bug. I can't reproduce it here, maybe we should take
> it offline.
I can reproduce it here. In zsh, both
>> ./setuptex:149: unmatched "
>
> What does that mean? Does setuptex contain other bugs or is it only a
> shell problem?
Yes, this is a bug. I can't reproduce it here, maybe we should take
it offline.
Arthur
On Jan 23, 2008 7:11 AM, Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
> Le 22 janvier à 23:24:31 Arthur Reutenauer écrit notamment:
>
> | > Actually, depends on your shell. In some shells, you will have to run
> | > source setuptex.
> >
> | Or even ". ./setuptex", actually. Anyway, you can check that it has
>
Le 22 janvier à 23:24:31 Arthur Reutenauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit notamment:
| > Actually, depends on your shell. In some shells, you will have to run
| > source setuptex.
>
| Or even ". ./setuptex", actually. Anyway, you can check that it has
| correctly been sourced by checking that CTXMI
Hi Jean,
That happened to me once too. I change the cases of the file names and
module
names, say from like MyModule to mymodule, and somehow pdftex could find it.
I
don't know whether it could be any useful to change your module's name to
lower
case.
On Jan 23, 2008 1:33 AM, Jean Magnan de Borni
> Actually, depends on your shell. In some shells, you will have to run
> source setuptex.
Or even ". ./setuptex", actually. Anyway, you can check that it has
correctly been sourced by checking that CTXMINIMAL is set (echo $CTXMINIMAL).
Arthur
_
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
Le 22 janvier à 20:14:42 "Mojca Miklavec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit notamment:
| Did you run
|. setuptex
| ?
I had not when first posting, but now I did, then mktexlsr and nothing
changed with my added modules.
Actually, depends on your
Le 22 janvier à 20:14:42 "Mojca Miklavec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit notamment:
| Did you run
|. setuptex
| ?
I had not when first posting, but now I did, then mktexlsr and nothing
changed with my added modules.
--
Jean
_
On Jan 22, 2008 6:33 PM, Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Having installed the minimal distro from
> http://minimals.contextgarden.net/ on my linux box (in my home directory)
> I added some own modules in
> /home/jean/lua/context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/extra an tried
> various tex
> 1/ Do you mean luatools --generate should be run whenever you add something
> to the distro?
Yes. It's the equivalent to mktexlsr for Mark IV.
>I ran it on install, but now when I try again:
>
> 20:01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/jean/lua % luatools --generate
>
> Lua
Le 22 janvier à 18:52:11 Arthur Reutenauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit notamment:
| Have you run luatools --generate? Mark IV does not use kpathsea, so
| mktexlsr would not be significant here.
Thanks Arthur
1/ Do you mean luatools --generate should be run whenever you add something
to the dist
> But these are still not found and I had to specify the complete path of
> the modules!
Have you run luatools --generate? Mark IV does not use kpathsea, so
mktexlsr would not be significant here.
Arthur
__
Hi all,
Having installed the minimal distro from
http://minimals.contextgarden.net/ on my linux box (in my home directory)
I added some own modules in
/home/jean/lua/context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/extra an tried
various texhash and mktexlsr:
mktexlsr lua/context/tex/texmf-context/tex/conte
14 matches
Mail list logo
