Le 27 oct. 04, à 05:50, David Arnold a écrit :
Is there a nath manual?
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/nath/
But it is for LaTeX only, and I'm am not sure of what is already
implemented in the m-nath module from Giuseppe Bilotta
...
Hum, I just see that this is already mention
Maurice Diamantini wrote:
Hum, I just see that this is already mention on the context portail
http://contextgarden.net/Math_with_nath
(So I just had the url)
as far as i know most functionality is available
Hans
-
Tuesday, October 26, 2004 Christopher Creutzig wrote:
Salvete,
[snip]
Christopher,
thank you very much for the patches. I'll give them a better
look as soon as I have some more time.
--
Giuseppe Oblomov Bilotta
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL
Salvete,
I finally managed to make t-nath work with \eqalign and \eqalignno. (I
assume I was not the only one having trouble there?) As it appears,
nath gets really confused when subformulas are enclosed in {} and
contain some form of delimiters. Therefore, the original definitions
just
Christopher Creutzig wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2\mex\!!width 0pt
since you are going the fast and efficient way (\using \!!dimena etc),
0pt can become \zeropoint (less space interference as well)
\!!dimenf=\fontdimen8\textfont2
\!!dimenf\fontdimen8\textfont\syfam
is more independent; maybe
Hans Hagen wrote:
\!!dimenf=\fontdimen8\textfont2
\!!dimenf\fontdimen8\textfont\syfam
OK, I should look those names up.
is more independent; maybe i should define symbolic names for the font
Independent of what? \textfont2 is exactly the font TeX would use, no?
Christopher Creutzig wrote:
Should have one just for code cleanliness, yes. But it's all in math
mode, so the spce should not do anything.
ah .. i'm not that math aware -)
if you make that fontdimen list i'll add the names to the kernel
also, i think that we need to sort out nath interference
Is there a nath manual?
At 06:18 PM 10/26/04 +0200, you wrote:
Le 26 oct. 04, à 17:55, Hans Hagen a écrit :
Christopher Creutzig wrote:
also, i think that we need to sort out nath interference some day soon
is there a test suite? if not, maybe it's worth the effort to cook up
a nice math
