Re[2]: [NTG-context] nath and \(start|stop)formula

2004-11-16 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Monday, November 15, 2004 Nikolai Weibull wrote: * Christopher Creutzig [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Nov 15, 2004 17:20]: Try \startnathequation ... \stopnathequation instead. Ah, thanks. Is there still a way to get unnumbered equations? nikolai Do not put \placeformula before the equation :)

Re: [NTG-context] nath and \(start|stop)formula

2004-11-16 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hallo, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: Try \startnathequation ... \stopnathequation instead. Ah, thanks. Is there still a way to get unnumbered equations? Do not put \placeformula before the equation :) Well, that changes a bit the spacing, how about \placeformula[-] ? Tobias

Re: [NTG-context] nath and \(start|stop)formula

2004-11-15 Thread Christopher Creutzig
Nikolai Weibull wrote: \usemodule[nath] \starttext $A = (B, C, D, E)$ \placeformula \startformula A = (B, C, D, E) \stopformula \stoptext ! Undefined control sequence. l.6 A = ( B, C, D, E) ? X Try \startnathequation ... \stopnathequation instead. Or patch