Am 24.03.2012 um 01:58 schrieb Renaud AUBIN:
Le 19/03/2012 11:36, Wolfgang Schuster a écrit :
Can you try to attached typescript file, I replaced the files for italic and
bolditalic fonts for the sans style with the names from the latex example
document. The slanted and boldslanted
Le 19/03/2012 11:36, Wolfgang Schuster a écrit :
Can you try to attached typescript file, I replaced the files for italic and
bolditalic fonts for the sans style with the names from the latex example
document. The slanted and boldslanted alternatives for the sans style are
also
fixed.
I just bought the new Lucida font from TUG and installed it in my local texmf
under fonts/opentype/bh/lucidaot/
Then I did:
mtxrun --generate
mtxrun --script font --reload
to be sure the new install will be picked up by ConTeXt mkiv.
I think I did read somewhere that mkiv will prefer otf
Am 19.03.2012 um 09:38 schrieb Meer, H. van der:
I just bought the new Lucida font from TUG and installed it in my local texmf
under fonts/opentype/bh/lucidaot/
Then I did:
mtxrun --generate
mtxrun --script font --reload
to be sure the new install will be picked up by ConTeXt mkiv.
Am 19.03.2012 um 10:38 schrieb Meer, H. van der:
Wolfgang, thanks.
I didn't know about the new identifier lucidaot. The TUG documentation seems
not to mention its use for ConTeXt. The otf now loads.
The sample document for the new fonts was typeset with LaTeX and Hans missed
the new
On 19 mrt. 2012, at 10:01, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
The new version of the lucida fonts use different names for the typescript, we
have now:
- “lucida” for the old type1 version,
- “lucidaot” for the new opentype version and
- “lucidanova” as alternative name for the opentype version.
The
Am 19.03.2012 um 11:12 schrieb Meer, H. van der:
On 19 mrt. 2012, at 10:01, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
The new version of the lucida fonts use different names for the typescript, we have now:
- “lucida” for the old type1 version,
- “lucidaot” for the new opentype version and
- “lucidanova”
