2011/1/27 Mojca Miklavec :
> luatex running on 64-bit Mas OS X for example). Somebody would have to
> write some simple code to check for that though.
Somebody, anybody, nobody... ,-)
___
If your question is of interes
On 01/27/11 00:21, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> However ... this discussion was already being held long ago ... there
> is no reason why luatex could not be as smart as "bash --version" is
> and aware of the architecture it was compiled for (that is not
> necessary the platform it is running on; an ob
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 22:16, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>> Maybe "bash --version" would be more reliable than uname?
>
> If you do something like that, then you may as well do
>
> $ file /bin/ls
Not too useful either ...
> bash --version
GNU bash, version 3.2.48(1)-release (x86_64-apple-darwin10.0)
