Renaud AUBIN wrote:
For internals, I don't know well diff between teTeX and TeXlive.
there is also the 'tex collection' which is texlive ++
the big collection tree (also used by protext) has more goodies; due to
all kind ot licence issues tetex/texlive tend to become smaller; some
fonts f
Ok, I've tried to reuse ConTeXt with tetex (Debian unstable package) and :
1. pdfTeX version is 1.21 (texlive2005 give 1.3x)
2. Lucida font is apparently more difficult to manage with teTeX
Experience from other people ?
Conclusion : apt-get remove tetex-* then reinstall texlive2005... If you
d
Salut Olivier,
teTeX benefits from an excellent integration with debian-like distros
i.e. you can update with the last version, install or not some exotic
packages like prosper for LaTeX (.deb package), tetex-frog for french
support. etc. But since TeXlive is based on teTeX, I believe that mo
olivier Turlier wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm going to install context on a linux box (ubuntu 5.10).
1) I wish to hear texnicians (rather than aficionados) words on wich
tex distro fit best for mainly context use, on fonts optimisation, for
exemple, etc.
2) is informations on contextgarden wiki
Hi everybody,
I'm going to install context on a linux box (ubuntu 5.10).
1) I wish to hear texnicians (rather than aficionados) words on wich tex
distro fit best for mainly context use, on fonts optimisation, for
exemple, etc.
2) is informations on contextgarden wiki are still uptodate for te
On 11/29/05, olivier Turlier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I'm going to install context on a linux box (ubuntu 5.10).
>
> 1) I wish to hear texnicians (rather than aficionados) words on wich tex
> distro fit best for mainly context use, on fonts optimisation, for
> exemple, etc.
teT
