[NTG-context] why is \getnumber an undefined control sequence?

2012-04-02 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
Hi all, what's wrong with this code? \definenumber [testnumber] [way=bytext,prefix=no] \starttext \incrementnumber[testnumber] A \getnumber[testnumber] \stoptext Works with older betas, craps out with latest. Thomas

Re: [NTG-context] why is \getnumber an undefined control sequence?

2012-04-02 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2-4-2012 16:46, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: Hi all, what's wrong with this code? \definenumber [testnumber] [way=bytext,prefix=no] \starttext \incrementnumber[testnumber] A \getnumber[testnumber] \stoptext Works with older betas, craps out with latest. they were already for a while

Re: [NTG-context] why is \getnumber an undefined control sequence?

2012-04-02 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On 04/02/2012 04:56 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: they were already for a while synonyms ... recently all 'structurecounter' names became 'counter' (the structure was a transition addition in order to have old and new code alongside) in the process we got rid of the 'number' synonyms so, just replace

Re: [NTG-context] why is \getnumber an undefined control sequence?

2012-04-02 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 02.04.2012 um 16:56 schrieb Hans Hagen: On 2-4-2012 16:46, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: Hi all, what's wrong with this code? \definenumber [testnumber] [way=bytext,prefix=no] \starttext \incrementnumber[testnumber] A \getnumber[testnumber] \stoptext Works with older betas,

Re: [NTG-context] why is \getnumber an undefined control sequence?

2012-04-02 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On 04/02/2012 05:15 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: The problem are these two synonyms: \let \getnumber \getcounter % [name] \let \convertednumber \getcounter % [name] There is a \convertedcounter but no \getcounter. @Thomas: You can \rawcounter to print only the

Re: [NTG-context] why is \getnumber an undefined control sequence?

2012-04-02 Thread Hans Hagen
On 2-4-2012 17:20, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On 04/02/2012 05:15 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: The problem are these two synonyms: \let \getnumber \getcounter % [name] \let \convertednumber \getcounter % [name] There is a \convertedcounter but no \getcounter. @Thomas: You can \rawcounter to

Re: [NTG-context] why is \getnumber an undefined control sequence?

2012-04-02 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 02.04.2012 um 17:20 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz: On 04/02/2012 05:15 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: The problem are these two synonyms: \let \getnumber \getcounter % [name] \let \convertednumber \getcounter % [name] There is a \convertedcounter but no