nico wrote:
On Sat, 06 May 2006 09:51:38 +0200, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nico wrote:
Hello,
When some footnotes are put in description terms, their number appears
in
the terms but their text don't appear at the bottom of the page. Is it a
known limitation?
On Sun, 07 May 2006 19:52:23 +0200, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, it works fine.
But as a side effect (not introduced by the patch) it seems that putting
footnotes in a term sets a fixed width to this term: in the example the
term wraps, even if I set width=broad in the
nico wrote:
On Sun, 07 May 2006 19:52:23 +0200, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, it works fine.
But as a side effect (not introduced by the patch) it seems that
putting
footnotes in a term sets a fixed width to this term: in the example the
term wraps, even if I set width=broad
nico wrote:
Hello,
When some footnotes are put in description terms, their number appears in
the terms but their text don't appear at the bottom of the page. Is it a
known limitation?
of boxed stuff, indeed, so we need to postpone and flush
\def\@@makedescription#1% in
