On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:52 AM, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote:
That's what I mean with not sure that \hsize and \startitemize must
play well together
No, sorry, wrong phrase.
What I mean is that I already found that \startitemize and \framed with
width=broad was not ok, because
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
from pack-rul:
\else\ifx\localwidth\v!broad
\boxhaswidthtrue
\!!framedwidth\hsize
\else\ifx\localwidth\v!local
\boxhaswidthtrue
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
I did not know about width=local (and therefore wanted width=broad to behave
like it). Given that, I think that broad behaves just fine. These differnt
options need to be documented better.
yes, in the wiki... where ?
--
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
I did not know about width=local (and therefore wanted width=broad to behave
like it). Given that, I think that broad behaves just fine. These differnt
options need to be
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
..
done at
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Framed#Width_broad_and_local
--
luigi
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hi all,
maybe there is already code for that, but I haven't found it: is it possible
to have itemgroups where every single item is within a frame (this is
something that may be interesting for presentations)? Just to give you an
idea of what I
On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
The problem is the vertical alignment of the item number, which
should be at the top of the frame. Is this possible?
Add location=top to \setupframed.
Aditya
Oh, that's good, thanks Aditya! The baselines still don't quite agree,
but
Am 16.11.2009 um 09:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
The problem is the vertical alignment of the item number, which should be
at the top of the frame. Is this possible?
Add location=top to \setupframed.
Aditya
Oh, that's good,
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
The problem is the vertical alignment of the item number, which should be
at the top of the frame. Is this possible?
Add location=top to \setupframed.
Aditya
Oh, that's good, thanks Aditya!
Am 16.11.2009 um 09:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
The problem is the vertical alignment of the item number, which should be
at the top of the frame. Is this possible?
Add location=top to \setupframed.
Aditya
Oh, that's good,
On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:55 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
If you hadn't notice the item is wider then the running text, in MkIV
you can say 'width=\dimexpr\textwidth-\itemgrouplistwidth\relax'
(not the best method but \localhsize is not available)
Wolfgang
Aditya, Wolfgang,
thanks a lot, I
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 16.11.2009 um 09:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
The problem is the vertical alignment of the item number, which should be at
the top of the frame. Is this possible?
Add location=top to
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 16.11.2009 um 09:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
The problem is the vertical alignment of the item number, which
Am 16.11.2009 um 10:09 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:55 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
If you hadn't notice the item is wider then the running text, in MkIV
you can say 'width=\dimexpr\textwidth-\itemgrouplistwidth\relax'
(not the best method but \localhsize is not
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 16.11.2009 um 09:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
The problem is the
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz
thomas.schm...@uni-bonn.de wrote:
On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:55 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
If you hadn't notice the item is wider then the running text, in MkIV
you can say 'width=\dimexpr\textwidth-\itemgrouplistwidth\relax'
(not the best
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu
wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 16.11.2009 um 09:41 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
I always thought that broad should use as much space as possible. So,
anything more or less is a bug :)
\starttext
\dorecurse{20}{%
\hsize=\dimexpr \textwidth / 20 *\recurselevel\relax
\framed[width=broad,align=middle]{
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
I always thought that broad should use as much space as possible. So,
anything more or less is a bug :)
\starttext
\dorecurse{20}{%
\hsize=\dimexpr \textwidth / 20
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
I think that itemize should adjust \hsize, so this is probably a bug in
itemize.
hmm I'm not sure to understand what you mean
What is wrong in this ?
\starttext
\dorecurse{20}{%
\hsize=\dimexpr \textwidth / 20
Am 16.11.2009 um 22:46 schrieb luigi scarso:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
I think that itemize should adjust \hsize, so this is probably a bug in
itemize.
hmm I'm not sure to understand what you mean
What is wrong in this ?
\starttext
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
I think that itemize should adjust \hsize, so this is probably a bug in
itemize.
hmm I'm not sure to understand what you mean
What is wrong in this ?
\starttext
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu
wrote:
I think that itemize should adjust \hsize, so this is probably a bug in
itemize.
hmm I'm not sure to
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:20 PM, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote:
That is wrong behaviour.We should have B = C = A - itemgrouplistwidth.
Otherwise, the frames inside the itemize environment exceed the total width.
-- Sorry wrong post --
\showframe
\starttext
\dorecurse{1}{%
Am 16.11.2009 um 23:31 schrieb luigi scarso:
I'm ( still :-) )
not sure that \hsize and \startitemize must play well together,
I will give it a look.
That's why we have \localhsize but it's not working.
Wolfgang
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
That's why we have \localhsize but it's not working.
yes, I was looking at \localhsize in the first post
--
luigi
___
If
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:42 PM, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
That's why we have \localhsize but it's not working.
\showframe
\starttext
\dorecurse{1}{%
\hsize=\dimexpr \textwidth / 1
Am 16.11.2009 um 23:49 schrieb luigi scarso:
\showframe
\starttext
\dorecurse{1}{%
\hsize=\dimexpr \textwidth / 1 *\recurselevel\relax
\framed[width=broad,align=middle]{\the\hsize}
\bgroup
\startitemize
\advance\hsize -\itemgrouplistwidth\relax%
\item
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 16.11.2009 um 23:49 schrieb luigi scarso:
\showframe
\starttext
\dorecurse{1}{%
\hsize=\dimexpr \textwidth / 1 *\recurselevel\relax
\framed[width=broad,align=middle]{\the\hsize}
\bgroup
Am 17.11.2009 um 00:19 schrieb luigi scarso:
as you can see in the third item the width of the text (\input tufte)
is too narrow because of the reduced \hsize but this works
yes too narrow,
but with this still
width=broad is not good,
because broad should be now egual to \localhsize
and
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
from pack-rul:
\else\ifx\localwidth\v!broad
\boxhaswidthtrue
\!!framedwidth\hsize
\else\ifx\localwidth\v!local
\boxhaswidthtrue
\setlocalhsize
\!!framedwidth\localhsize
31 matches
Mail list logo
