Re: [NTG-context] referenceformat, text

2010-08-09 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
Hans Hagen wrote: On 9-8-2010 12:22, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: \NC \in [x] \NC \in {left}[x] \NC \in {}{right}[x] \NC \in {left}{right}[x] \NC \NR I see no left or right in the first string in PDF output. Just 1\t1\t1\t1. sure, as \in has no left and right (nor a setup)

Re: [NTG-context] referenceformat, text

2010-08-09 Thread Hans Hagen
On 9-8-2010 9:17, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: Hans Hagen wrote: On 9-8-2010 12:22, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: \NC \in [x] \NC \in {left}[x] \NC \in {}{right}[x] \NC \in {left}{right}[x] \NC \NR I see no left or right in the first string in PDF output. Just 1\t1\t1\t1. sure,

Re: [NTG-context] referenceformat, text

2010-08-09 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
Hans Hagen wrote: On 9-8-2010 9:17, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: Hans Hagen wrote: On 9-8-2010 12:22, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: \NC \in [x] \NC \in {left}[x] \NC \in {}{right}[x] \NC \in {left}{right}[x] \NC \NR I see no left or right in the first string in PDF output. Just

Re: [NTG-context] referenceformat, text

2010-08-08 Thread Hans Hagen
On 8-8-2010 2:44, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: Hi! The following code: \definereferenceformat[lem][text=Lemma] \inlem[lem:mylemma] produces just a number, no Lemma prefix. I've sent a patch to fix it a while ago. Could you please apply it, or tell me why you don't want to apply it? because it

Re: [NTG-context] referenceformat, text

2010-08-08 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
Hans Hagen wrote: On 8-8-2010 2:44, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: Hi! The following code: \definereferenceformat[lem][text=Lemma] \inlem[lem:mylemma] produces just a number, no Lemma prefix. I've sent a patch to fix it a while ago. Could you please apply it, or tell me why you don't want

Re: [NTG-context] referenceformat, text

2010-08-08 Thread Hans Hagen
On 8-8-2010 7:19, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: Hans Hagen wrote: On 8-8-2010 2:44, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: Hi! The following code: \definereferenceformat[lem][text=Lemma] \inlem[lem:mylemma] produces just a number, no Lemma prefix. I've sent a patch to fix it a while ago. Could you please

Re: [NTG-context] referenceformat, text

2010-08-08 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
Hans Hagen wrote: On 8-8-2010 7:19, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: Hans Hagen wrote: On 8-8-2010 2:44, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: Hi! The following code: \definereferenceformat[lem][text=Lemma] \inlem[lem:mylemma] produces just a number, no Lemma prefix. I've sent a patch to fix it a

Re: [NTG-context] referenceformat, text

2010-08-08 Thread Hans Hagen
On 8-8-2010 7:40, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: this is only one case (we also need labels, content, left and right to work ok) I uploaded a beta that handles the following as intended. \starttext \definereferenceformat [intesta] [left=(,right=),text=Whatever~] \definereferenceformat [intestb]

Re: [NTG-context] referenceformat, text

2010-08-08 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 09.08.10 00:22, schrieb Yury G. Kudryashov: I see no left or right in the first string in PDF output. Just 1\t1\t1\t1. Try it again later, it takes always a while till the beta is in the minimals. Other strings work as expected except for ~ in text= field. In the earlier versions ~ was

Re: [NTG-context] referenceformat, text

2010-08-08 Thread Hans Hagen
On 9-8-2010 12:22, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: \NC \in [x] \NC \in {left}[x] \NC \in {}{right}[x] \NC \in {left}{right}[x] \NC \NR I see no left or right in the first string in PDF output. Just 1\t1\t1\t1. sure, as \in has no left and right (nor a setup)