Re: [NTG-context] new typeface toy

2004-06-27 Thread Adam Lindsay
Hans Hagen said this at Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:46:52 +0200:

if you're happy with type-flx (we can make a synonym btw)

Oh, no synonym needed for my part (not deployed in a major project).
Are you happy with the approach? Do you reckon the 5.16667pt and 6.0pt x-
height will be sufficient? (Lucida in particular is shrunk very
significantly, but then Lucida is an exception anyway.)

adam
-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Adam T. Lindsay  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Computing Dept, Lancaster University   +44(0)1524/594.537
 Lancaster, LA1 4YR, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/593.608
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] compile problems

2004-06-27 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Saturday, June 26, 2004 Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:

 Hi gang,

 I'm having trouble compiling the eomega format with the latest ConTeXt
 (6-21):

 \texmf-var\web2ceomega --ini *plain \dump

 works, but then

 \texmf-var\web2ctexexec --make --alone en -tex=eomega
 eomega: unrecognized option `-translate-file=natural.tcx'
 Try `eomega --help' for more information.

 fails. On the other hand

 eomega --ini *cont-en

 works, but then I get e.g.,

  executable : EOMEGA
  format : cont-en
   inputfile : decision
  output : standard
   interface : en
current mode : none
 TeX run : 1

 EOMEGA: unrecognized option `-translate-file=natural.tcx'
 Try `EOMEGA --help' for more information.

texexec is adding a -translate-file=  option; please check your
texexec.ini file and remove any -translate-file=.. option from
the options passed to the tex engine.

-- 
Giuseppe Oblomov Bilotta



___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: [NTG-context] compile problems

2004-06-27 Thread Idris Samawi Hamid
Hi,
There is really something screwy going on with the latest beta; what is 
the problem calling upon the /texmf/web2c/natural.tcx file?? I hope 
someone can help with this soon; this is like having a flat tire in the 
middles of nowhere...

On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 13:01:07 -0600, Idris Samawi Hamid 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi gang,
I'm having trouble compiling the eomega format with the latest ConTeXt 
(6-21):

\texmf-var\web2ceomega --ini *plain \dump
works, but then
\texmf-var\web2ctexexec --make --alone en -tex=eomega
eomega: unrecognized option `-translate-file=natural.tcx'
Try `eomega --help' for more information.
fails. On the other hand
eomega --ini *cont-en
works, but then I get e.g.,
 executable : EOMEGA
 format : cont-en
  inputfile : decision
 output : standard
  interface : en
   current mode : none
TeX run : 1
EOMEGA: unrecognized option `-translate-file=natural.tcx'
Try `EOMEGA --help' for more information.
Please help!
Best
Idris

--
Professor Idris Samawi Hamid
Department of Philosophy
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, CO 80523
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


[NTG-context] compile problems

2004-06-27 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hi Idris,

 Remove the -translate-file option
 from texexec.ini and try again.

 There are no *.ini files in the latest beta, but 2 *.rme files; which
 one of them should be modified (or both)?

diff ./texmf/context/config/texexec.rme ./texmf/scripts/context/perl/texexec.rme

- no difference ;-)

copy one of those to texexec.ini. I have mine here:
texmf/context/config/texexec.ini

HTH,

Patrick
-- 
texshow-web:  http://members.ping.de:8061
ConTeXt wiki: http://members.ping.de:8062
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re: Re[2]: [NTG-context] compile problems

2004-06-27 Thread Idris Samawi Hamid
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:27:44 -0600, Idris Samawi Hamid 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:55:27 +0200, Giuseppe Bilotta 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Remove the -translate-file option
from texexec.ini and try again.
There are no *.ini files in the latest beta, but 2 *.rme files; which 
one of them should be modified (or both)?
I just modified both; it appears 2 work now. Now I can test some things in 
the new beta...

I hope that in the next beta something can be done to obliviate the need 
to edit the rme files! (Or better, an Aleph-pdfetex merge but I'll stop 
dreaming for now:-)

--
Professor Idris Samawi Hamid
Department of Philosophy
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, CO 80523
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context