Hi Stefano,
I have to be brief, I do not have enough time on my hands right now to
deal extensively with bibmodule issues. It is on my todo list for the
near future though.
Stefano wrote:
I have been using the bibmodule for a couple of weeks now, and it works
great! ... but, I have run into some
Hello,
Please tell me how to check the version of ConTEXt that is installed on
my system. I am running Slackware 10.1.
Thanks,
Anand
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Conceptually, the .bib format does not really exist where the module
is involved. I consider the .bbl file to be the actual source
database (this is why there is a \usepublications command).
If someone doesn't want the 1995a item in the bbl, just delete it
for the bbl file
R S Ananda Murthy wrote:
Hello,
Please tell me how to check the version of ConTEXt that is installed on
my system. I am running Slackware 10.1.
texexec --version
If it complains about an unknown option, you ConTeXt is too old :-)
Taco
___
ntg-context
Hello,
R S Ananda Murthy wrote:
Please tell me how to check the version of ConTEXt that is installed
on my system. I am running Slackware 10.1.
Run kpsewhich context.tex and look in that file for \def\contextversion.
Or, run ConTeXt and look at one of the first lines it spits out. It
should
Mark Smith wrote:
Put another way, what is the rationale behind having e.g.:
y=2005a instead of y=2005
and:
\pubyear{2005\maybeyear{a}} instead of \pubyear{2005}
?
The suffixes are needed because otherwise author,year styles
cannot differentiate between different publications by
I wrote:
Another minor question: why are the text contents of the abstract
field hard-wrapped ?
Because they were so in the original bib file.
Sorry, perhaps I lied.
They are probably automatically inserted by bibtex.
Taco
___
ntg-context mailing list
I added following two lines in conf-pre-main.tex,
\usetypescriptfile[type-xall] %script file
\usetypescript[myface] %typeface
In type-xall.tex,
\starttypescript[serif][smmjr][uc]
% Regular variant:
\definefontsynonym[smMyungjoRegular][smMyungjoR\space
W30][encoding=uc]
= Original Message From mailing list for ConTeXt users
ntg-context@ntg.nl =
Recently I installed the latest stable version of ConTeXt under MiKTeX
(b20050215).
To use Chinese characters in ConTeXt, I installed some Chinese Type1 fonts
and related map/enc files.
However, I found texexec
Hello I followed Adams nice way, to include unicode symbols. Now I want
to ask, how these can be scaled, so that they can be used more like
small figures. Any hints?
TIA,
__Janko Hauser
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
Hi,
In the latest versions of the Antykwa Torunska fonts there are also
oldstyle figures.
Though I have no problem to get \os{3} typeset I am not able to have the
date tpeset with oldstyle figures. How can I achieve that?
\currentdate[dd,{.~},mm,{.~},year]
KR
Willi
Hello Hans,
[LaTeX tables]
what exactly are you missing?
There is a good file that pretty much describes what I am missing
(perhaps haven't found in a manual - I never looked that close):
http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/booktabs/booktabs.pdf
There are commands like
I had exactly the same problem today after updating from an older
tetex/context to the latest version of tetex.
Problem seems to be some modifications in pdftex.
After moving my type1 fonts (that previously worked fine) with their
tfm, afm and type1 files to the new $HOME/.texmf-var/fonts
Janko Hauser said this at Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:58:23 +0200:
Hello I followed Adams nice way, to include unicode symbols. Now I want
to ask, how these can be scaled, so that they can be used more like
small figures. Any hints?
Hmm, it depends a bit on how you get these (I assume) Unicode symbols
Willi Egger said this at Thu, 31 Mar 2005 22:30:37 +0200:
Though I have no problem to get \os{3} typeset I am not able to have the
date tpeset with oldstyle figures. How can I achieve that?
\currentdate[dd,{.~},mm,{.~},year]
With the new Antykwa Torunska fonts, I also introduced some
Greetings all,
In working with the bib module, I've been trying to understand the
addition of a field. There is a \newbibfield command, but it is not
entirely clear where to declare it. E.g., I want to have a field called
yearnote. If I place this in the list of commands in the t-bib.tex
file,
Dear ConTeXters,
This message is to record my thanks to Thomas A.Schmitz for the
solution to my font flop, and to Otared Kavian and Hans Hagen for
helpful comments. I've planted the solution in the context garden at
http://contextgarden.net/Talk:My_Way.
If I hear voices of encouragement I
David Wooten wrote:
Greetings all,
In working with the bib module, I've been trying to understand the
addition of a field. There is a \newbibfield command, but it is not
entirely clear where to declare it.
The normal place would be in the bibl-XXX style, because it depends
on that. But anywhere
Adam Lindsay wrote:
Janko Hauser said this at Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:58:23 +0200:
Hello I followed Adams nice way, to include unicode symbols. Now I want
to ask, how these can be scaled, so that they can be used more like
small figures. Any hints?
Hmm, it depends a bit on how you get these (I
19 matches
Mail list logo
