On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Sanjoy Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm experimenting with making a heading that is like a chapter in format
but has its own numbering (or lettering). The purpose to have an
interlude, or extended example, every few chapters. The following
almost-minimal
Dear All,
Renaud Aubin wrote:
See http://www.nibua-r.org/ConTeXt/devel/
while the macros there are a great improvement from
what was posted on the list and look extandable for my purposes
(thanks, Renaud),
the other question remains - does it make sense to try to implement
3d model embedding in
Dnia Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:30:51PM -0600, Lars Huttar napisa#322;(a):
It makes sense for italicness and serifity to be independently
changeable.
What's discouraging to me as a entrant to the whole TeX world (but an
experienced programmer) is the (apparently undocumented) redefinition of
a
On Tue, Nov 25 2008, Lars Huttar wrote:
If it's designed not to do that in ConTeXt -- i.e. the ConTeXt designers
decided to change the semantics of one of the basic control sequences in
TeX, rather than merely providing a different one with new semantics --
you would think one would want that
hi:
it seems that mpfigure will be in the wrong position using the xetex engine.
here is the sample file:
% engine=xetex
\starttext
\setupcolors
[state=start]
\startMPpage
path p ; color c[] ;
p := fullsquare scaled 4cm ;
c[0] := transparent(1,.5,red) ;
c[1] :=
Am 26.11.2008 um 10:04 schrieb Yue Wang:
hi:
it seems that mpfigure will be in the wrong position using the xetex
engine.
here is the sample file:
% engine=xetex
\starttext
\setupcolors
[state=start]
\startMPpage
path p ; color c[] ;
p := fullsquare scaled 4cm ;
c[0] :=
ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX.
I have been recieving emails from CoNTeXt list and it seems that ConTeXt has
heaps of bugs.
LaTeX rocks...!
Get a FREE AOL Email account with
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX.
yes, true.
Also
LaTeX peaple always have used to say that LaTeX is better than ConTeXt
is true
I have been recieving emails from CoNTeXt list and it seems
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX.
I have been recieving emails from CoNTeXt list and it seems that ConTeXt has
heaps of bugs.
LaTeX rocks...!
Anyone who has never made a mistake has never
Dnia Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:38:59AM +0100, luigi scarso napisa#322;(a):
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX.
yes, true.
Not entirely (see below).
Also
LaTeX peaple always have used to say
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Michail Vidiassov [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Dear All,
Renaud Aubin wrote:
See http://www.nibua-r.org/ConTeXt/devel/
while the macros there are a great improvement from
what was posted on the list and look extandable for my purposes
(thanks, Renaud),
the
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Marcin Borkowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dnia Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:38:59AM +0100, luigi scarso napisa#322;(a):
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than
LaTeX.
I am on the wrong list because I just said ``LaTeX rocks''?
I would like to apologise you and anyone else from the bottom of my heart if I
have offended you and others, but honestly I did not mean it.
I am just on this list because I want to study ConText (its TeX programming)
more deeply.
On 11/26/2008 2:41 AM, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Dnia Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:30:51PM -0600, Lars Huttar napisa#322;(a):
It makes sense for italicness and serifity to be independently
changeable.
What's discouraging to me as a entrant to the whole TeX world (but an
experienced programmer) is
Am 26.11.2008 um 12:45 schrieb Sanjoy Mahajan:
luigi scarso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seem that interlude is like a section, so it's correct that at
every chapter there is a reset of the alphabetical counter
I meant the interludes to be long examples based upon the preceding
few
Hi,
in MkIV there is a problem when I set tints for a color.
This is a complete minimal example of my setup:
\setupcolors[state=start,rgb=no,cmyk=yes,spot=yes] % rgb= no needed in
MkII
\setupcolor [hex]
\definecolor[PantoneOneEightSeven][h=C40F2F,e=Pantone 187 U]
\definespotcolor[dtkred]
On 11/26/2008 7:43 AM, Lars Huttar wrote:
...
and the word regular in typography usually (as far as
I can tell... please enlighten) means upright in contrast to italic.
I now see that regular (apparently less often) can refer to weight:
not bold or light. Still, the point remains.
Lars
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX.
I have been recieving emails from CoNTeXt list and it seems that ConTeXt has
heaps of bugs.
Staying at an older version of ConTeXt (for example, I always use
Lars Huttar wrote:
Except perhaps the documentation. I have yet to find a reference that
clearly describes what \rm is to do in ConTeXt. One responder pointed to
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/cont-eni.pdf. The closest
thing to a definition of \rm there that I could find is on
Dnia Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:09:08AM +0100, luigi scarso napisa#322;(a):
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Marcin Borkowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dnia Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:38:59AM +0100, luigi scarso napisa#322;(a):
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX.
I have been recieving emails from CoNTeXt list and it seems that ConTeXt
has heaps of bugs.
?
for sure the luatex/mkiv (not to be confused with pdftex/mkii) pair has
heaps of bugs (which are
luigi scarso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seem that interlude is like a section, so it's correct that at
every chapter there is a reset of the alphabetical counter
I meant the interludes to be long examples based upon the preceding few
chapters. So I think of interludes as at the same level as
moreover, setupinteraction[state=start, focus=normal] and \goto will
always point to the wrong position in xetex.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 26.11.2008 um 10:04 schrieb Yue Wang:
hi:
it seems that mpfigure will be in the wrong position
Hi:
Please, shut up and code: we need to fix these bugs first!
Yue Wang
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Marcin Borkowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dnia Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:38:59AM +0100, luigi scarso napisa#322;(a):
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ConTeXt
Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Me not being an experienced programmer, but (some kind) of more or less
experienced TeX user, I'd add the following.
...
makes a nice 'about tex systems' page for the wiki
-
Same question related to setuplayout.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Alan STONE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
The main manual mentions (ch 5 Typography, pg 92):
In most cases, the command \setupbodyfont is only used once: in the
styledefinition.
Fontswitching is done with \switchtobodyfont.
Michail Vidiassov wrote:
Dear All,
Renaud Aubin wrote:
See http://www.nibua-r.org/ConTeXt/devel/
while the macros there are a great improvement from
what was posted on the list and look extandable for my purposes
(thanks, Renaud),
the other question remains - does it make sense to try
Lars Huttar wrote:
Interesting.
As a newbie to typesetting, reading the TeXbook, I certainly wondered
which axes Knuth meant 'roman' to refer to... he simply describes it
as 'normal roman' and gives a visual example. So far, all I'd gathered
was that it meant not italic.
you should keep in
Dnia Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 04:28:35AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa#322;(a):
ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX.
I have been recieving emails from CoNTeXt list and it seems that ConTeXt has
heaps of bugs.
LaTeX rocks...!
Sorry, but I just can't
Am 26.11.2008 um 12:43 schrieb Alan STONE:
The main manual mentions (ch 5 Typography, pg 92):
In most cases, the command \setupbodyfont is only used once: in the
styledefinition.
Fontswitching is done with \switchtobodyfont. Don't mix these two up
because this may
lead to some rather
Jelle Huisman wrote:
% columnset running into footer area
\definelayout[1][]
\setupheader[state=high]
\definetext[footerpagenumber][footer][pagenumber]
\setuphead[chapter][page=yes,header=high,footer=footerpagenumber,number=no,align=middle]
\definecolumnset[columnl][n=2]
\showgrid
Hello,
Here's a tiny question. The following command complains about
undefined control sequence.
\starttext
\startluacode
print('a\tb')
\stopluacode
hello
\stoptext
There is a workaround:
print(string.format('a\t%s', 'b'))
but I find it weird. Even if the line above gets commented out with
Am 26.11.2008 um 20:07 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
Hello,
Here's a tiny question. The following command complains about
undefined control sequence.
\starttext
\startluacode
print('a\tb')
print('a\t b')
\stopluacode
hello
\stoptext
There is a workaround:
Hans,
What's the chances on getting this fixed? Or is there a stable branch
somewhere that I can grab?
Thanks!
Bart
On Tuesday 25 November 2008 11:47:38 am Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 25.11.2008 um 19:39 schrieb Bart C. Wise:
Below are four different ways I've tried to get endnotes to
34 matches
Mail list logo
