Re: [NTG-context] \setupenumeration(s) was: defineenumeration does not work with MKIV
Am 05.01.2010 um 05:08 schrieb Vladimir Lomov: 2010/1/5 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com: Sorry to hijack your post and since we're already there, why are \setupenumerations and \setupdescriptions written in the plural form. \setupenumerations[problem][stopper=)] When I would follow the system from other setup commands in context i expect as correct names \setupenumeration and \setupdescription. If I understand context manual correctly (I not checked this) (cont-enp.pdf, pp. 181,183) I could use more than one name in \setupenumerations (\setupdescriptions), e.g. \setupenumerations[problem,remark][stopper=)] so name of commands are correct (in some sense one is a limit of several :). You could also use more names in \setuphead, \setupblock etc. but these command names are singular. Changing \setupenumerations/descriptions is no option but one can do this: \let\setupdescription\setupdescriptions \let\setupenumeration\setupenumerations Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Natural Tables Cell Borders
On 5-1-2010 4:02, Curiouslearn wrote: Thanks Wolfgang. I am not yet proficient enough in Metapost or Context to understand your code. But will look at it more carefully later. Meanwhile, is there any further work going on on Natural Tables? Are there plans to introduce the ability to have borders of different thickness for the same cell through simple options. normally that is demand driven i.e. if i need it in a project or so Hans ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Thoughts on ConTeXt: ditched
Il 03/01/2010 19.45, Piotr Kopszak ha scritto: Well, well, ConTeXt can help you if you give him a little love and don't try pull all triggers at once. Having written my Ph.D. in LaTeX and published couple of books in ConTeXT I can assure you, ConTeXt is surprisingly better suited for scientific texts (oops sorry, I just mean text with footnotes, bibliography, a couple of indexes, list of illustrations, definitions whatever) even if you disregard its typographic quality. That's of course my entirely subjective opinion. Piotr I've several passions, and one of them is desktop publishing and design (although I'm still a newbie) so a more in-depth exploration of ConTeXt in some future is likely. -- Manuel P. ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII
Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only recently. Can someone please throw light on this? Is the disapperance of the numbers, as Vladimir suggests, expected behavior of the minimal example in MKIV. On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Vladimir Lomov lomov...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I'm newbie with ConTeXt but have experience with LaTeX. 2010/1/5 Curiouslearn curiousle...@gmail.com: Minimal example \setuppapersize[letter][letter] \starttext \defineenumeration[problem][text= ,location=inleft] \setupenumerations[problem][stopper=)] \problem problem 1 \problem problem 2 \stoptext In MKIV there are numbers do not appear. Thanks. This is because of your settings. Try change location. In order to understand what's wrong with your settings see output for this example (I tried with context minimals): \setuppapersize[A5][A4] \setuplayout[location=middle] \starttext \defineenumeration[problem][text= ,location=inleft] \setupenumerations[problem][stopper=)] \problem problem 1 \problem problem 2 \stoptext In okular (or Adobe Reader) you see that enumeration numbers are out of page and you don't see them. ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] Referencing...
Hi,
I have small tabulations which contain references to footnotes in the
header line. - The footnotes are placed correctly, how ever if I
refer to the references I get in 2 out of the three cases ?? i.e.
ConTeXt does not know the reference. I am puzzled because it works
for the third reference... When extending the list of footnotes again
the referencing works only for the last reference.
Is there something changed in the approach in MKIV?
\starttext
\starttabulate[|l|c|r|r|r|]
\NC Issue \NC Time \NC Avg.\footnote[av]{Average log\low{10} values}
\NC s\footnote[stdv]{Standard deviation} \NC se\footnote[se]{Standard
error of the mean} \NC\NR
\NC A \EQ 1 \NC 3.85 \NC 1.06 \NC 0.31 \NC\NR
\stoptabulate
\starttabulate[|l|c|r|r|r|]
\NC Issue \NC Time \NC Avg.\note[av] \NC s\note[stdv] \NC se\note[se]
\NC\NR
\NC B \EQ 1 \NC 1.18 \NC 0.8 \NC 0.23 \NC\NR
\stoptabulate
Look at s\note[av]
\stoptext
I am using:
This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.50.0-2009122422
ConTeXt ver: 2010.01.03 12:54 MKIV fmt: 2010.1.4 int: english/english
Kind regards
Willi
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII
Am 05.01.2010 um 14:22 schrieb Curiouslearn: Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only recently. Add 'headalign=flushright'. Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII
Thanks! That worked great. On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 05.01.2010 um 14:22 schrieb Curiouslearn: Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only recently. Add 'headalign=flushright'. Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII
Hello. 2010/1/5 Curiouslearn curiousle...@gmail.com: Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only recently. Sorry, I didn't try to check texexec (MKII) also I just checked context (MKIV). Can someone please throw light on this? Is the disapperance of the numbers, as Vladimir suggests, expected behavior of the minimal example in MKIV. I also notice the difference between resulted pdf files produced by MKII and MKIV: MKIV gives labels _below_ line respect to item entry but MKII gives labels on the same line as item entry (also MKIV moves labels much more to left edge). This is what I figured out, sorry I too novice with ConTeXt and can't give more information on topic. 2010/1/5 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com: Am 05.01.2010 um 14:22 schrieb Curiouslearn: Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only recently. Add 'headalign=flushright'. Hm, this gives more unpleasant result for MKIV format but reveals the problem of disappearing :) --- WBR, Vladimir Lomov ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII
Am 05.01.2010 um 14:56 schrieb Vladimir Lomov: Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only recently. Add 'headalign=flushright'. Hm, this gives more unpleasant result for MKIV format but reveals the problem of disappearing :) It's side effect of the new 'headalign' key, you can correct by setting the correct width for the number box. \defineenumeration [problem] [text=, location=inleft, headalign=flushright, stopper=), width=\leftmarginwidth] Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII
Hi. 2010/1/5 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com: Am 05.01.2010 um 14:56 schrieb Vladimir Lomov: Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only recently. Add 'headalign=flushright'. Hm, this gives more unpleasant result for MKIV format but reveals the problem of disappearing :) It's side effect of the new 'headalign' key, you can correct by setting the correct width for the number box. \defineenumeration [problem] [text=, location=inleft, headalign=flushright, stopper=), width=\leftmarginwidth] Yes, this works like a charm (checked in both TL2009 and context-minimals for MKII and MKIV formats). --- WBR, Vladimir Lomov ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Referencing...
On 5-1-2010 14:46, Willi Egger wrote: Is there something changed in the approach in MKIV? sure, no common note code in mkii and mkiv fixed, Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] What is the luatex version of \pdfescapehex
Hi, I've written a very old module which used a lot of pdf primitives like \pdfescapehex and \pdfescapename etc. and it turns out not they don't work in mkiv. So I just want to know are there any alternatives? TIA -- Best Regards Chen Zhi-chu Chen | Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility No. 2019 | Jialuo Rd. | Jiading | Shanghai | P.R. China tel: 086 21 5955 3405 | zhichu.chen.googlepages.com | www.sinap.ac.cn ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] startbuffer fails with %
\startbuffer[ABC]%
{} Braces at beginning fails with buffer
\stopbuffer
\starttext
\getbuffer[ABC]
\stoptext
Error message:
! File ended while scanning use of \dododowithbuffer.
inserted text
\par
Remove the {}'s at the beginning and all is well.
The culprit however is the % in the first line; remove and the braces
do no harm.
I suspect that a missed newline is the cause. If that cannot be
remedied, I advise adding a warning in the manual.
Hans van der Meer
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
