Re: [NTG-context] \qedhere equivalent in ConTeXt

2010-08-07 Thread Emanuele Sacco
Thank you very much, but still does not work to me.. %%% \definedescription [proof] [text=Proof.] \setupdescriptions [proof] [width=broad, distance=0.5em, location=serried, headstyle=it, indentnext=yes, indenting=yes, closesymbol=\mathematics{\square},

Re: [NTG-context] \qedhere equivalent in ConTeXt

2010-08-07 Thread Thomas Schmitz
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 10:54:52 +0200 Emanuele Sacco emanuelesa...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you very much, but still does not work to me.. %%% \definedescription [proof] [text=Proof.] \setupdescriptions [proof] [width=broad, distance=0.5em, location=serried, headstyle=it,

Re: [NTG-context] \qedhere equivalent in ConTeXt

2010-08-07 Thread Emanuele Sacco
You are absolutely right. Thanks to all. 2010/8/7 Thomas Schmitz tschm...@uni-bonn.de: On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 10:54:52 +0200  Emanuele Sacco emanuelesa...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you very much, but still does not work to me.. %%% \definedescription [proof] [text=Proof.]

Re: [NTG-context] an issues with punk module

2010-08-07 Thread views63
In latest beta the punk module was normal and the PunkNova font is working. Thanks to all. -- Best regards, Huang Ze ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

[NTG-context] Problem with cross references

2010-08-07 Thread Robert Blackstone
Hi all, I would like to get some advice concerning a problem, or rather a nuisance, with internal references. I am making a longish document with several chapters, all of which are separate .tex-files to be input into the main file, which contains all setups and the skeleton of the document. There

Re: [NTG-context] Problem with cross references

2010-08-07 Thread Thomas Schmitz
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 14:22:32 +0200 Robert Blackstone blackstone.rob...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I would like to get some advice concerning a problem, or rather a nuisance, with internal references. I am making a longish document with several chapters, all of which are separate .tex-files to

[NTG-context] abbreviations as macros

2010-08-07 Thread ivo welch
Hi Hans: This is asking Armin Varmaz' question in a different way, although I know even less. I would like to define a macro that is just an abbreviation. For example, say I want to define a snippet \NPV which provides the text NPV$_0$, and NPV is in textfont while 0 is in mathfont. This

Re: [NTG-context] abbreviations as macros

2010-08-07 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, ivo welch wrote: Hi Hans: This is asking Armin Varmaz' question in a different way, although I know even less. I would like to define a macro that is just an abbreviation. For example, say I want to define a snippet \NPV which provides the text NPV$_0$, and NPV is in

[NTG-context] Commands based on previously defined commands, with fixed values for arguments

2010-08-07 Thread Vedran Miletić
How can I define a command by reusing the already defined command? \def \HelloTwo #1#2 {Hello, #1 and #2!} \def \HelloOne #1 {\HelloTwo{#1}{Vedran}} This gives me a Runaway argument. -- Vedran Miletić ___ If your

[NTG-context] =?UTF-8?Q?Re:__Commands_based_on_previously_defined_commands, =D=A_with_fixed_values_for_=9arguments?=

2010-08-07 Thread R. Bastian
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 18:03:22 +0200 Vedran Miletić riva...@gmail.com scribit: How can I define a command by reusing the already defined command? \def \HelloTwo #1#2 {Hello, #1 and #2!} \def \HelloOne #1 {\HelloTwo{#1}{Vedran}} This gives me a Runaway argument. -- Vedran Miletić where

Re: [NTG-context] Commands based on previously defined comm ands, DA with fixed values for šrguments

2010-08-07 Thread Vedran Miletić
2010/8/7 R. Bastian rbast...@free.fr: On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 18:03:22 +0200 Vedran Miletić riva...@gmail.com scribit: How can I define a command by reusing the already defined command? \def \HelloTwo #1#2 {Hello, #1 and #2!} \def \HelloOne #1 {\HelloTwo{#1}{Vedran}} This gives me a Runaway

Re: [NTG-context] Commands based on previously defined commands, with fixed values for arguments

2010-08-07 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, Vedran Miletić wrote: How can I define a command by reusing the already defined command? \def \HelloTwo #1#2 {Hello, #1 and #2!} \def \HelloOne #1 {\HelloTwo{#1}{Vedran}} This gives me a Runaway argument. Can you post a complete example? This works for me

Re: [NTG-context] Commands based on previously defined commands, with fixed values for arguments

2010-08-07 Thread Vedran Miletić
2010/8/7 Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu: Can you post a complete example? This works for me \def\HelloTwo#1#2{Hello, #1 and #2!} \def\HelloOne#1{\HelloTwo{#1}{Vedran}} \starttext \HelloOne {One} \stoptext Same here, it works. From what I see, you removed the spacing, and if I add it

Re: [NTG-context] Commands based on previously defined commands, with fixed values for arguments

2010-08-07 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
Are there any rules where the space should be and where it should not? The way you wrote the macro originally, the spaces were part of the macro. If you use your original definition of \HelloTwo, you can write \HelloOne as follows: \def \HelloOne #1 {\HelloTwo {#1}{Vedran} }

Re: [NTG-context] Commands based on previously defined comm ands, DA with fixed values for šrguments

2010-08-07 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
Even if this is completely unrelated to ConTeXt, allow me to mention this since I find it so funny: The message to which I'm replying has the following weird subject: # Subject: Re: [NTG-context] Commands based on previously defined commands, # DA with fixed values for šrguments