Re: [NTG-context] \big\lfloor and \big\lceil do not work

2015-05-12 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Hans, While you are at the delimiters, could you please add also \| as an alias for \Vert? The command \| exists in plain TeX (and in many other TeX packages used by mathematicians) as an alias for the double bar norm, \Vert, or ||, while as of now in ConTeXt it is an alias for the

[NTG-context] vim module: modify line wrapping

2015-05-12 Thread Andreas Schneider
Hi, vimtyping already offers line wrapping by specifying lines=split. However, some /lines/with/very/long/sequences/of/somehow/breakable/chars do not break at all. In that given example, I would like to also allow vimtyping to break lines at /. Is something like that possible? And if so: how?

Re: [NTG-context] Changing font for math function

2015-05-12 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Tue, 12 May 2015, Maggyero wrote: Hans Hagen wrote: for functions one can now use: \setupmathematics [functionstyle=\rm] Fantastic! Thank you Hans, it is way better than the old mechanism \setmathfunctionstyle. Now I have a few suggestions to improve the consistency of this new

[NTG-context] Verbatim text.

2015-05-12 Thread John Culleton
The inline string quoted below produces a correct result but also generates an error message: \type{8 1/2 x 11} Is there a better way to handle this situation? -- John Culleton Wexford Press Free list of books for self-publishers: http://wexfordpress.net/shortlist.html Updated PDF e-book:

Re: [NTG-context] Changing font for math function

2015-05-12 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu wrote: Note that there is no consensus on how the `d` in calculus should be typeset. There are also \differentiald and \differentialD that map to unicode slots. Maybe not consensus, but see tug.org/TUGboat/tb18-1/tb54becc.pdf

Re: [NTG-context] vim module: modify line wrapping

2015-05-12 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Tue, 12 May 2015, Andreas Schneider wrote: Hi, vimtyping already offers line wrapping by specifying lines=split. However, some /lines/with/very/long/sequences/of/somehow/breakable/chars do not break at all. In that given example, I would like to also allow vimtyping to break lines at /.

Re: [NTG-context] Verbatim text.

2015-05-12 Thread Hans Hagen
On 5/12/2015 9:11 PM, John Culleton wrote: The inline string quoted below produces a correct result but also generates an error message: \type{8 1/2 x 11} Is there a better way to handle this situation? what error -

Re: [NTG-context] Changing font for math function

2015-05-12 Thread Aditya Mahajan
And in my opinion, names for operators and subscripts should all be upright, that is adaptative to the surrounding TEXT STYLE (\rm, \ss and \tt) BUT not adaptative to the surrounding TEXT ALTERNATIVE or MATH ALTERNATIVE (\it, \bi, \sl, \bs) and stay in the normal alternative \tf (upright). This

Re: [NTG-context] Changing font for math function

2015-05-12 Thread Hans Hagen
On 5/12/2015 4:19 PM, Maggyero wrote: Hans Hagen wrote: for functions one can now use: \setupmathematics [functionstyle=\rm] Fantastic! Thank you Hans, it is way better than the old mechanism \setmathfunctionstyle. Now I have a few suggestions to improve the consistency of this new

Re: [NTG-context] \big\lfloor and \big\lceil do not work

2015-05-12 Thread Hans Hagen
On 5/12/2015 8:12 AM, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Hans, While you are at the delimiters, could you please add also \| as an alias for \Vert? The command \| exists in plain TeX (and in many other TeX packages used by mathematicians) as an alias for the double bar norm, \Vert, or ||, while

[NTG-context] Changing font for math function

2015-05-12 Thread Maggyero
Hans Hagen wrote: for functions one can now use: \setupmathematics [functionstyle=\rm] Fantastic! Thank you Hans, it is way better than the old mechanism \setmathfunctionstyle. Now I have a few suggestions to improve the consistency of this new mechanism. First, I think this functionstyle key

[NTG-context] Changing font for math function

2015-05-12 Thread Maggyero
Sorry, I did 3 typos in my previous post. — First typo: 3. Using only \mathlabeltext with \setuplabeltext is also more consistent with the current \labeltext that works with \setuplabeltext. 3. Using only \mathlabeltext with \setupmathlabeltext is also more consistent with the current \labeltext