[NTG-context] Re: Overfull boxes using m-cweb

2003-10-14 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hi, I am running into overfull boxes when including a weaved cweb file into a context document. I don't really understand your question. You have overfull boxes in your TeX run. That is a normal TeX feature. They can usually be avoided. But in your case I guess that it is something which you

[NTG-context] Re: Overfull boxes using m-cweb

2003-10-14 Thread Edwin Wisse
Patrick Grundlach wrote: I am running into overfull boxes when including a weaved cweb file into a context document. I don't really understand your question. You have overfull boxes in your TeX run. That is a normal TeX feature. They can usually be avoided. But in your case I guess that it is

Re: [NTG-context] Visual creators for ConTeXt

2003-10-14 Thread Hans Hagen
At 21:45 13/10/2003, you wrote: Hi, I promised link to creators for ConTeXt ;) http://www.im.ps.pl/context/?en (and http://www.im.ps.pl/context/ for polish users) But - please note - there is early pre-beta version ;) I will work to increase functionality and performance of this. It works in IE6

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Overfull boxes using m-cweb

2003-10-14 Thread Hans Hagen
At 10:54 14/10/2003, Patrick Gundlach wrote: Hi, I am running into overfull boxes when including a weaved cweb file into a context document. I don't really understand your question. You have overfull boxes in your TeX run. That is a normal TeX feature. They can usually be avoided. But in your

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Overfull boxes using m-cweb

2003-10-14 Thread Edwin Wisse
Hans Hagen wrote: it may be a result of many unbreakable (key)words, so in that case try: \setuptolerance[verytolerant,stretch] Hans It seems to be caused by the fact that \hbox is used frequently in m-cweb.tex. \hbox-es are unbreakable aren't they? Anyway your solution results in plenty of

Re: [NTG-context] Visual creators for ConTeXt

2003-10-14 Thread Willi Egger
Hi, At 21:45 13.10.2003, Martin wrote: Hi, I promised link to creators for ConTeXt ;) http://www.im.ps.pl/context/?en (and http://www.im.ps.pl/context/ for polish users) But - please note - there is early pre-beta version ;) I will work to increase functionality and performance of this. It works

Re: [NTG-context] Re: uncompatibility?

2003-10-14 Thread Hans Hagen
At 11:59 12/10/2003, you wrote: Hi, I should describe it more precisely. I use installations (2 at the moment) based on TL distributions. With the supplied ConTeXt versions? Anyway, I'm aware, that ConTeXt is developing quite fast and I probably shouldn't expect, that 2002.524 and 2003.10.5

Re: [NTG-context] Re: font mystery

2003-10-14 Thread Hans Hagen
At 13:23 11/10/2003, you wrote: \startembarrassment I found out what caused the strange behavior. I was testing the font in a directory where there was also an old instance of the .tfm-file. So Context would search the working directory, find everything it needed to produce the font, and thus

Re: [NTG-context] Re: uncompatibility?

2003-10-14 Thread Hans Hagen
At 08:26 12/10/2003, you wrote: 2003.10.5 versions gives the same output. Could you give me a recipe to spy changes? I'm sure they are documented, but don't know how to get them. most changes concern (yet) undocumented features, bug fixes, extensions discussed on this list (user requests) ;

Re: [NTG-context] Re: uncompatibility?

2003-10-14 Thread Hans Hagen
At 17:36 11/10/2003, you wrote: Lets consider the following code: \setupitemize[4,packed] \starttext \startitemize[n] \item one \item two \item three \stopitemize \stoptext The problem is that in newer installation, default itemize style (meaning packed, with triangle symbol) IS FORCED

[NTG-context] Re: Visual creators for ConTeXt

2003-10-14 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hi, (btw, do you use the xml alternative of the command reference?) (why alternative? ;-)) This is a very good question! I'd like to know, too :) We could establish a cont-??.xml working group. Or a technical committee. Patrick -- You are your own rainbow!

Re: [NTG-context] Re: texfont and type-tmf.dat

2003-10-14 Thread Nigel King
Why do you whish to reinstall all the supplied fonts? Or do you just want to learn how to use texfont? I simply wish to use the fonts as most others do (I think) and I am unable to because of this bug. The normal context fonts do not exist on Gerben's version. Before Gerben's reorganisation they

Re: [NTG-context] TeX Live 2003 miseries.

2003-10-14 Thread George N. White III
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, John Culleton wrote: I installed the latest version of TeXLive 2003 (the so-called demo version) and did the fmtutil and texhash bit. When I ran a job for a customer, texexec hung up at the point where a graphic was being loaded. So I went back to last year's texlive in

Re: [NTG-context] Re: texfont and type-tmf.dat

2003-10-14 Thread George N. White III
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Nigel King wrote: Why do you whish to reinstall all the supplied fonts? Or do you just want to learn how to use texfont? I simply wish to use the fonts as most others do (I think) and I am unable to because of this bug. The normal context fonts do not exist on Gerben's

Re: [NTG-context] Re: uncompatibility?

2003-10-14 Thread Pawel Jackowski na Onet
Problem: a (very) different ConTeXt versions and a different output From: Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:52 PM At 17:36 11/10/2003, you wrote: Lets consider the following code: \setupitemize[4,packed] \starttext \startitemize[n]