[NTG-context] Integrating Metapost

2003-10-30 Thread Lutz Haseloff
Hallo all, Running texexec on a ConTeXt-file with integrated METAPOST-Graphics METAPOST complains about: --- local_multi_par_area false ! Equation cannot be performed (numeric=boolean). to be read again ; l.218 local_multi_par_area:=false; ?

Re: [NTG-context] Integrating Metapost

2003-10-30 Thread Nigel King
l.218 local_multi_par_area:=false; Presuming that the line is in your file as written I think you need a line earlier which says boolean local_multi_par_area; -- Nigel ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[NTG-context] Kerning pairs for Optima-Italic

2003-10-30 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Hi, after I converted MacOSX's Optima.dfont for usage with TeX I experienced that this Adobe Optima (Regular, Italic, Bold, BoldItalic, ExtraBold) doesn't have extra kerning pairs. (And I don't have any idea how to create these on my own.) So I had a look at WalterSchmidt's page

[NTG-context] Re: Integrating Metapost

2003-10-30 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Lutz Haseloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What can the error be? anything. Perhaps an out of sync ConTeXt and metafun version. Please regenerate metafun and ConTeXt formats, make a simple test file, run it, double check that the versions are OK and if the error persist, please post a minimal (but

[NTG-context] Re: another itemize question

2003-10-30 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hi, TeXshow, but unfortunately the \setupitemize command is not listed there. - In the english manual I could find the use of this command, it is listed as \setupitemgroup are they synonyms? why two names? For those, who still wonder: \setupitemize is a command generated by

Re: [NTG-context] Re: another itemize question

2003-10-30 Thread Gary Pajer
it is listed as \setupitemgroup are they synonyms? why two names? For those, who still wonder: \setupitemize is a command generated by \defineitemgroup. \defineitemgroup [\v!itemize] [\c!niveaus=6] in core-itm.tex Good idea to clear that up. Now back to our regularly scheduled