[NTG-context] Re: how to get bottom-vertical-alignment in (natural) table cells?

2004-02-15 Thread Stefan Wachter
Hi Willi, thanks for your reply - it works. Just for completeness: is top alignment termed high? Willi Egger wrote: Hi Stefan, May be not quit logic, but when replacing the bottom by low you get the desired result. Kind regards Willi Stefan Wachter wrote: Hi all! I try to set a simple

[NTG-context] Re: proportional column widths in natural tables?

2004-02-15 Thread Stefan Wachter
Hi Willi, thanks for your reply. Can you please tell me, what the makeupwidth is? It seems that I have to do some calculations for the widths by myself: I have a CALS table model where the widths are specified by proportional weights. - I have to sum the weigths of all columns and divide each

Re: [NTG-context] Re: proportional column widths in natural tables?

2004-02-15 Thread Willi Egger
Hi Stefan, From the english manual...p24-25 Basically textwidth is the width available at the moment i.e. when in any other sitation than one column. Makeupwidth is the total width of the typesetting area. Concerning you CALS table model, I assume indeed that you will have to calculate the

Re: [NTG-context] Re: how to get bottom-vertical-alignment in (natural) table cells?

2004-02-15 Thread Willi Egger
Hi Stefan, I would not know whether it can be generalized. In text you can place text superscript with \high{superscripted text}. Mostly I would have a look into the help-system for commands. You can start it with e.g. texshow setuptabulate. If you use the SciTe editor it is you can setup it

Re: [NTG-context] Re: proportional column widths in natural tables?

2004-02-15 Thread Hans Hagen
At 19:55 15/02/2004, you wrote: Hi Willi, thanks for your reply. Can you please tell me, what the makeupwidth is? It seems that I have to do some calculations for the widths by myself: I have a CALS table model where the widths are specified by proportional weights. - I have to sum the weigths