Re: Re[6]: [NTG-context] Known nath bugs?

2004-06-08 Thread Gary Pajer
The latest nath (submitted to CTAN, you can retrieve it from there) works correctly on my MiKTeX installation, both inline and displayed obey the structure. Please try updating nath. If it still doesn't work: do you have the same ConTeXt version on the two system? -- Giuseppe Oblomov

[NTG-context] overall TABLE width

2004-06-08 Thread Nigel King
Dear ConTeXtnicians, Normally \bTABLE...\eTABLE encourages itself to the textwidth of the page that it is on. I have a requirement for a table which is occupying a full page rotated. What command encourages TABLE to a different overall width. I cannot find anything in manuals and archives. TIA

Fwd: Re: [NTG-context] Re: Switching form portrait to landscape and back to portrait

2004-06-08 Thread Adam Lindsay
Found this in my archives. Is that sufficient, or (ick) does the table float? adam Begin Forwarded Message Subject: Re: [NTG-context] Re: Switching form portrait to landscape and back to portrait Date Sent: Thursday, 20 February 2003 18:29 From: Hans Hagen

Re: [NTG-context] loss of references after changing page arrangement

2004-06-08 Thread Hans Hagen
R. Ermers wrote: Hi Contexers, Does anyone know why I lose all my references to sections (\in[abc]) and pages (\at[abc]) when I specify a smaller page arrangement, e.g. 2*2? did you use --arrange when processing the document ? you need to make sure that the utility file is not overwritten

Re[8]: [NTG-context] Known nath bugs?

2004-06-08 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Tuesday, June 8, 2004 Gary Pajer wrote: Thank you very much, yes, the new version does work. Giuseppe, please note: I waited a few days to make sure CTAN was up to date. When I first looked for the file, there were different versions on different mirrors. One was dated 2003.12.07, the