Hans Hagen said this at Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:46:52 +0200:
if you're happy with type-flx (we can make a synonym btw)
Oh, no synonym needed for my part (not deployed in a major project).
Are you happy with the approach? Do you reckon the 5.16667pt and 6.0pt x-
height will be sufficient? (Lucida in
Saturday, June 26, 2004 Idris Samawi Hamid wrote:
Hi gang,
I'm having trouble compiling the eomega format with the latest ConTeXt
(6-21):
\texmf-var\web2ceomega --ini *plain \dump
works, but then
\texmf-var\web2ctexexec --make --alone en -tex=eomega
eomega: unrecognized option
Hi,
There is really something screwy going on with the latest beta; what is
the problem calling upon the /texmf/web2c/natural.tcx file?? I hope
someone can help with this soon; this is like having a flat tire in the
middles of nowhere...
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 13:01:07 -0600, Idris Samawi Hamid
Hi Idris,
Remove the -translate-file option
from texexec.ini and try again.
There are no *.ini files in the latest beta, but 2 *.rme files; which
one of them should be modified (or both)?
diff ./texmf/context/config/texexec.rme ./texmf/scripts/context/perl/texexec.rme
- no difference ;-)
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 12:27:44 -0600, Idris Samawi Hamid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 19:55:27 +0200, Giuseppe Bilotta
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remove the -translate-file option
from texexec.ini and try again.
There are no *.ini files in the latest beta, but 2 *.rme files; which
