Re: [NTG-context] location of texsync.rb/minimal ConTeXt installation

2004-09-04 Thread Hans Hagen Outside
Nikolai Weibull wrote: Where is texsync.rb located at the moment? It is not on http://www.pragma-ade.com/system/texsync.rb or anywhere in that directory, nor in the /context/ one. isn't it under texmf-*/scripts/context/ruby ? Hans

Re: [NTG-context] location of texsync.rb/minimal ConTeXt installation

2004-09-04 Thread Hans Hagen
Nikolai Weibull wrote: Where is texsync.rb located at the moment? It is not on http://www.pragma-ade.com/system/texsync.rb or anywhere in that directory, nor in the /context/ one. If that script isn't supported anymore, what's the difference between cont-bas.zip, justtex.zip.bz2, and

[NTG-context] bug in mp

2004-09-04 Thread Hans Hagen
Hi, I'm currently translating all commands in the sources to english; for that i use metafun as test file. In the process I ran into a metapost fuzziness: var_123456 is not handled ok, since mp scans numbers due to the way it implements arrays. This may result in problems with transparency

[NTG-context] Re: Re: Re: [FONTS] Japanese Unicode

2004-09-04 Thread Nikolai Weibull
* Hans Hagen Outside [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Sep 04, 2004 18:30]: So I still need to keep it in $TEXMF/pdftex/config/ it's hard coded in pdftex, it's one of the changes for the next release of tex(live) Aha. Thanks for clarifying. I dunno, but it seems most people are running texlive nowadays?

[NTG-context] Re: location of texsync.rb/minimal ConTeXt installation

2004-09-04 Thread Nikolai Weibull
* Hans Hagen Outside [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Sep 04, 2004 18:30]: Where is texsync.rb located at the moment? isn't it under texmf-*/scripts/context/ruby ? In linuxtex.zip.bz2 you mean? (why the double compression?) Then no. Neither is it in any of the cont-*.zip files; nor in

Re: [NTG-context] Re: location of texsync.rb/minimal ConTeXt installation

2004-09-04 Thread Hans Hagen Outside
Nikolai Weibull wrote: In linuxtex.zip.bz2 you mean? (why the double compression?) the zip is not compressed, just use as storage container, bzipping the whole unzipped lot is more efficient Then no. Neither is it in any of the cont-*.zip files; nor in