> XeTeX always converts, say, c + combining caron into a ccaron whenever
> one exists in the font
Does it really? I had understood from the last discussion on the
XeTeX list that it did not, with the example of capital alpha +
combining breathing which was not set correctly. But maybe it's LaT
> if i know the precise specs i can build it into the utf collapser
I can work that out for you, but we need to think about how to treat
all this consistently, in particular with respect to the questions Mojca
raised:
· Equivalent sequences need to be treated the same way (c + combining
c
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:59:27 -0700, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> In luatex can I make a definition such that such that the string
>>>
>>> U004C U0303 (l ̃)
>>>
>>> is always treated as l with tilde above, taking into account italics
>>> and
>>> without using \~l (which does not work
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
>> :) This is how it is done in plain TeX, and both LaTeX and ConTeXt follow
>> this. If you do not use maths at all, you can say
>>
>> \catcode`\_ = 11
>
> or ...
>
> \nonknuthmode
>
> (there's also \donkunthmode -)
Hey, somehow ne
Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
> Hello Idris,
>
> I didn't see any reply to this e-mail you sent two weeks ago, so I
> wanted to give it a try:
>
>> In luatex can I make a definition such that such that the string
>>
>> U004C U0303 (l ̃)
>>
>> is always treated as l with tilde above, t
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> :) This is how it is done in plain TeX, and both LaTeX and ConTeXt follow
> this. If you do not use maths at all, you can say
>
> \catcode`\_ = 11
or ...
\nonknuthmode
(there's also \donkunthmode -)
-
Hi Hans,
I have always found the space at the beginning of each item in
\startitemize[text] to be too large. Currently, this is hard coded to be
\emwidth plus \intertwordstretch minus \interwordshrink (line 1132 of
core-itm.tex with the comment "new per 2006/10/20"). I always end of
copying the
> Thanks for the reminder. We have been thinking about creating an
> lpeg variant that operates on tokens and/or nodes instead of
> simple data strings, but that will take quite a bit of work.
That sure would be nice.
> It would be possible to simplify the loop logic by storing 'v' in
> a local
I only wanted to add a note:
XeTeX always converts, say, c + combining caron into a ccaron whenever
one exists in the font (and does that on a really low-level). If
ccaron doesn't exist (or if there's no such comination in unicode), it
simply requests both glyphs from the font (and only modern font
Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
> Hello Idris,
>
> I didn't see any reply to this e-mail you sent two weeks ago, so I
> wanted to give it a try:
>
>> In luatex can I make a definition such that such that the string
>>
>> U004C U0303 (l ̃)
>>
>> is always treated as l with tilde above, t
10 matches
Mail list logo
