Am 30.05.2008 um 09:12 schrieb Yue Wang:
advanced software, like InDesign
Well, ...
Steffen
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist :
Hi all,
The page on the wiki about emacs-muse and ConTeXt has been updated to show
how you can use Thomas Schmitz's presentation module within muse:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/ConTeXt_and_emacs-muse
enjoy!
--
Jean
Hi Hans,
I got yesterday a bug report for my letter module if the \startletter
command takes no arguments.
The following example show the problem without the module.
\def\startletter
{\dosingleempty\dostartletter}
\def\dostartletter[#1]%
{\dostartbuffer[letter][startletter][stopletter]}
Am 2008-05-31 um 04:20 schrieb luigi scarso:
There are still some areas where you need a programmable system, even
trivia like chapter dependant running titles (in ConTeXt:
headertexts).
Isn't indesign programmable too ?
I know people who use it in an automatic workflow for db publishing
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
\doifsomething{#1}
{\tmpblockstartedtrue
%\immediate\write\tmpblocks{\string#1}}%
\immediate\write\tmpblocks{#1}}%
i have no problem with the \long but changing the \string ... it's there
for a reason so i need to look into it
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Steffen Wolfrum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
hope the answer to my question is not too obvious: How do I split not
only TABLE but cells?
Please, have a look at this minimal:
\starttext
\bTABLE[split=yes,option=stretch]
\bTR
\bTD
\input tufte \input
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hi Hans,
I got yesterday a bug report for my letter module if the \startletter
command takes no arguments.
The following example show the problem without the module.
\def\startletter
{\dosingleempty\dostartletter}
\def\dostartletter[#1]%
Hi Hans,
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
\doifsomething{#1}
{\tmpblockstartedtrue
%\immediate\write\tmpblocks{\string#1}}%
\immediate\write\tmpblocks{#1}}%
i have no problem with the \long but
Last night I remembered two more things that TeX can't do, but every
layout app can:
- text flow around other elements (images)
\parshape ?
- really working multiple-column layout
in context columnset with two pass strategy
--
luigi
On 5/31/08, luigi scarso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last night I remembered two more things that TeX can't do, but every
layout app can:
- text flow around other elements (images)
\parshape ?
I forword an email to the professor.
it discuss some of the points together with some examples.
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Yue Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/31/08, luigi scarso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last night I remembered two more things that TeX can't do, but every
layout app can:
- text flow around other elements (images)
\parshape ?
I forword an email to the
- much faster (i.e. I don't need to wait for several TeX runs e.g. if
I need to check if some tweak fixed my page breaking)
On average
true for manual composition, maybe false for automatic workflow
- optical (vs. metrical) kerning
hz ?
- a GUI ;-) and thus layout by let's try how it looks
I would say that TeX is a way in which a mathematician / theoretical
computer scientist that is well-steeped in music, languages, art,
literature, and other areas might approach the issue. InDesign is the
way in which a large number in the design community might approach the
issue.
I use mainly
luigi scarso wrote:
- optical (vs. metrical) kerning
hz ?
all those kerning options can lead to rather bad text ... i get the
impression that wrongly applied hz (extreme values) and intercharacter
spacing and such in general lead to bad text ... i read quite some books
and am sometimes
14 matches
Mail list logo