Am 05.01.2010 um 05:08 schrieb Vladimir Lomov:
2010/1/5 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com:
Sorry to hijack your post and since we're already there, why are
\setupenumerations
and \setupdescriptions written in the plural form.
\setupenumerations[problem][stopper=)]
On 5-1-2010 4:02, Curiouslearn wrote:
Thanks Wolfgang. I am not yet proficient enough in Metapost or Context
to understand your code. But will look at it more carefully later.
Meanwhile, is there any further work going on on Natural Tables? Are
there plans to introduce the ability to have
Il 03/01/2010 19.45, Piotr Kopszak ha scritto:
Well, well,
ConTeXt can help you if you give him a little love and don't try pull
all triggers at once. Having written my Ph.D. in LaTeX and published
couple of books in ConTeXT I can assure you, ConTeXt is surprisingly
better suited for
Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
recently.
Can someone please throw light on this? Is the disapperance of the
numbers, as Vladimir suggests, expected behavior of the minimal
example in MKIV.
Hi,
I have small tabulations which contain references to footnotes in the
header line. - The footnotes are placed correctly, how ever if I
refer to the references I get in 2 out of the three cases ?? i.e.
ConTeXt does not know the reference. I am puzzled because it works
for the third
Am 05.01.2010 um 14:22 schrieb Curiouslearn:
Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
recently.
Add 'headalign=flushright'.
Wolfgang
Thanks! That worked great.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 05.01.2010 um 14:22 schrieb Curiouslearn:
Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It
Hello.
2010/1/5 Curiouslearn curiousle...@gmail.com:
Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
recently.
Sorry, I didn't try to check texexec (MKII) also I just checked context (MKIV).
Can someone
Am 05.01.2010 um 14:56 schrieb Vladimir Lomov:
Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
recently.
Add 'headalign=flushright'.
Hm, this gives more unpleasant result for MKIV format but reveals
Hi.
2010/1/5 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com:
Am 05.01.2010 um 14:56 schrieb Vladimir Lomov:
Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it
work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only
recently.
Add 'headalign=flushright'.
On 5-1-2010 14:46, Willi Egger wrote:
Is there something changed in the approach in MKIV?
sure, no common note code in mkii and mkiv
fixed,
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Hi,
I've written a very old module which used a lot of pdf primitives like
\pdfescapehex
and \pdfescapename etc. and it turns out not they don't work in mkiv.
So I just want
to know are there any alternatives?
TIA
--
Best Regards
Chen
\startbuffer[ABC]%
{} Braces at beginning fails with buffer
\stopbuffer
\starttext
\getbuffer[ABC]
\stoptext
Error message:
! File ended while scanning use of \dododowithbuffer.
inserted text
\par
Remove the {}'s at the beginning and all is well.
The culprit however is the % in
13 matches
Mail list logo
