On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Thomas Schmitz wrote:
Robert Blackstone blackstone.rob...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to get some advice concerning a problem, or
rather a
nuisance, with internal references.
Difficult to analyze, of course, but one thing that
occurred to me: are
Hi!
The following code:
\definereferenceformat[lem][text=Lemma]
\inlem[lem:mylemma]
produces just a number, no Lemma prefix. I've sent a patch to fix it a
while ago. Could you please apply it, or tell me why you don't want to apply
it?
--
Yury G. Kudryashov---
Hi,
I've put up a small script that generates color definitions from Randall
Munroe's color survey for use with ConTeXt.[1] This yields 949 more rgb
colors that might be more adequately labeled than e.g. those from X11.
You can find it at http://bitbucket.org/phg/xcs-colors/
From the usage
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2010 11:10:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Aditya Mahajan [
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] abbreviations as macros
Message-ID: [
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, ivo welch wrote:
If you never need to
On 6-8-2010 8:22, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Am 06.08.2010 um 19:40 schrieb Hans Hagen:
On 6-8-2010 7:01, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Could you give an example on this (thresholds for ht and dp), please?
% none don't enlarge
% halfline enlarge by halfline/halfline
This
On 8-8-2010 2:44, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hi!
The following code:
\definereferenceformat[lem][text=Lemma]
\inlem[lem:mylemma]
produces just a number, no Lemma prefix. I've sent a patch to fix it a
while ago. Could you please apply it, or tell me why you don't want to apply
it?
because it
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010, Armin Varmaz wrote:
Hi Aditya,
can you tell me how I can ensure as in AMSmath that the font size in
abbreviations automatically match the font size of current text? see my
example below.
Best Armin
EXAMPLE
Shorter example showing what goes wrong:
Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8-8-2010 2:44, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hi!
The following code:
\definereferenceformat[lem][text=Lemma]
\inlem[lem:mylemma]
produces just a number, no Lemma prefix. I've sent a patch to fix it a
while ago. Could you please apply it, or tell me why you don't want
On 8-8-2010 7:19, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8-8-2010 2:44, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hi!
The following code:
\definereferenceformat[lem][text=Lemma]
\inlem[lem:mylemma]
produces just a number, no Lemma prefix. I've sent a patch to fix it a
while ago. Could you please
Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8-8-2010 7:19, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8-8-2010 2:44, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hi!
The following code:
\definereferenceformat[lem][text=Lemma]
\inlem[lem:mylemma]
produces just a number, no Lemma prefix. I've sent a patch to fix it
a
On 8-8-2010 7:40, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
this is only one case (we also need labels, content, left and right to
work ok)
I uploaded a beta that handles the following as intended.
\starttext
\definereferenceformat [intesta] [left=(,right=),text=Whatever~]
\definereferenceformat [intestb]
Am 09.08.10 00:22, schrieb Yury G. Kudryashov:
I see no left or right in the first string in PDF output. Just
1\t1\t1\t1.
Try it again later, it takes always a while till the beta is in the
minimals.
Other strings work as expected except for ~ in text= field. In the earlier
versions ~ was
On 9-8-2010 12:22, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
\NC \in [x] \NC \in {left}[x] \NC \in {}{right}[x] \NC \in
{left}{right}[x] \NC \NR
I see no left or right in the first string in PDF output. Just
1\t1\t1\t1.
sure, as \in has no left and right (nor a setup)
Hi all,
I do a lot of LaTeX writing as my stuff is very math intensive, but
I have a lot of interest in ConTeXt as I would like my books to look better.
Anyway, I try on and off to get ConTeXt running so I can experiment.
I just spent a pleasurable day playing. Here is what I found.
It was
There's a plain TeX package (bussproofs.sty from CTAN; I realize that
the file ends with .sty but it's intended to work in plain TeX) that
I'm trying to get working with ConTeXt. I'm stuck at one point though:
the package has the statements
\def\newcount{\al...@0\count\countdef\insc@unt}
15 matches
Mail list logo
