On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
>
> Am 18.02.2012 um 20:19 schrieb luigi scarso:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
>> wrote:
>>> can also be \setupnote[…][rule={on,right,\MyRule}] which is ugly and two
>>> step mechanism like \setuplist[…][alternativ
Am 18.02.2012 um 20:19 schrieb luigi scarso:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
> wrote:
>>
>> Am 18.02.2012 um 20:04 schrieb luigi scarso:
>>
>> I think a separate key for the command is better because this
>>
>>> \setupnote[footnote][rule=\MyRule]
>>
>> can also be \setup
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
wrote:
>
> Am 18.02.2012 um 20:04 schrieb luigi scarso:
>
> I think a separate key for the command is better because this
>
>> \setupnote[footnote][rule=\MyRule]
>
> can also be \setupnote[…][rule={on,right,\MyRule}] which is ugly and two step
>
Am 18.02.2012 um 20:04 schrieb luigi scarso:
I think a separate key for the command is better because this
> \setupnote[footnote][rule=\MyRule]
can also be \setupnote[…][rule={on,right,\MyRule}] which is ugly and two step
mechanism like \setuplist[…][alternative=command,command=\MyList] are be
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
wrote:
>
> Am 17.02.2012 um 14:41 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> what's wrong here??
>>
>> \unexpanded\def\MyRule{\blackrule[color=orange,width=18mm,height=0.4pt]}
>>
>> \setupnote[footnote][rule=\MyRule]
>>
>> \starttext
>>
>> teset\foot
Am 17.02.2012 um 16:40 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
> Hi,
>
> with current beta I get an interesting symbol in cases when my footnotetext
> doesn't fit on the same page as its marker:
>
>
>
> Nice! But how can I switch it off?
\setupnote[symbolcommand=\gobbleoneargument]
Wolfgang
_
Am 17.02.2012 um 14:41 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
> Hi,
>
> what's wrong here??
>
> \unexpanded\def\MyRule{\blackrule[color=orange,width=18mm,height=0.4pt]}
>
> \setupnote[footnote][rule=\MyRule]
>
> \starttext
>
> teset\footnote{text}.
>
> \stoptext
Your \MyRule commands (even though you us
On 02/18/2012 11:10 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 18-2-2012 08:03, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> many thanks for the new beta.
>
> I quickly hacked a solution (line numbering needs to be adapted to new
> margin code some day).
Thanks for your help, Hans.
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
_
On 18-2-2012 08:03, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
Hi Hans,
many thanks for the new beta.
I quickly hacked a solution (line numbering needs to be adapted to new
margin code some day).
Hans
--
-
On 18-2-2012 09:35, luigi scarso wrote:
http://code.google.com/p/sigil/
has a checker, and it shows some errors. Last time
sorry...
http://code.google.com/p/sigil/
has a checker, and it shows some errors. Last time I was quite busy to
fix ids and something else, but it was before the epub 3.0
w
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:31 AM, luigi scarso wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> On 18-2-2012 08:17, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>>
>>> I would really prefer to use only html tags when a epub file is produced,
>>> now the files can be only viewed without problems in firef
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 18-2-2012 08:17, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>
>> I would really prefer to use only html tags when a epub file is produced,
>> now the files can be only viewed without problems in firefox (with the
>> epubreader extension) which is nonsense. Wit
On 18-2-2012 08:17, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
I would really prefer to use only html tags when a epub file is produced, now
the files can be only viewed without problems in firefox (with the epubreader
extension) which is nonsense. With the epub 3 standard also mathml is supported
and when a r
13 matches
Mail list logo
