On Jul 4, 2012, at 10:56 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Rogers, Michael K
mrog...@emory.edumailto:mrog...@emory.edu wrote:
XML seems a nice way for machines to deal with data. But it's not a very human
way to speak. I mean, if I write \section{One}...\section{Two}
On 5-7-2012 04:28, JIN Xiao-Yong wrote:
I got the following error in the minimal example (which is all shown in the
output below)
system tex error on line 4 in file simpl.tex: Undefined
control sequence ...
you can try (in page-mul)
\installcolumnbreakmethod \s!multicolumn \v!yes
On 5-7-2012 03:12, Kip Warner wrote:
Hey list,
Nightly 2012.07.04 appears to break when compiling my book. I see the
following:
! Undefined control sequence.
\math_arrows_construct_single ...s \p_mathspacing
\p_mathspacing = \p_math_spacing
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Rogers, Michael K mrog...@emory.eduwrote:
On Jul 4, 2012, at 1:29 PM, Peter Münster wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04 2012, Hans Hagen wrote:
no, mixing this way is asking for troubles, if not now, than maybe in
the
future
just use \section
Yes, but isn't
On Jul 5, 2012, at 5:02 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 5-7-2012 04:28, JIN Xiao-Yong wrote:
I got the following error in the minimal example (which is all shown in the
output below)
system tex error on line 4 in file simpl.tex: Undefined
control sequence ...
you can try (in
In the ConTeXT manual I see that a construct
\framed{A\\B\\C} should type set as three lines below each other:
A
B
C
But instead the \\'ssmb://'s disappear without a trace.
Did I miss some change on the use of \\'ssmb://'s in \framed?
Could it be a sideeffect of recent changes?
Hans van der
Sorry, missed the inclusion of the output of the minimal example.
In the ConTeXT manual I see that a construct
\framed{A\\B\\C} should type set as three lines below each other:
A
B
C
But instead the \\'s disappear without a trace.
Did I miss some change on the use of \\'s in \framed?
Could it
Am 05.07.2012 um 11:01 schrieb Meer, H. van der:
Sorry, missed the inclusion of the output of the minimal example.
In the ConTeXT manual I see that a construct
\framed{A\\B\\C} should type set as three lines below each other:
A
B
C
But instead the \\'s disappear without a trace.
Thanks.
Indeed, the align does the trick. But what is the raison d'être of coupling the
behaviour of \\ to the align parameter? I wouldn't have known out but for your
reply. Is it something to add to the wiki on framed? (sorry, I am not apt at
these things myself, too old ;-). Or can it be done
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Meer, H. van der wrote:
Indeed, the align does the trick. But what is the raison d'être of
coupling the behaviour of \\ to the align parameter? I wouldn't have
known out but for your reply. Is it something to add to the wiki on
framed? (sorry, I am not apt at these things
2012/7/5 Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu:
Without align={normal|middle|left|right}, \framed is equal to \hbox. You
cannot have line breaks in a \hbox. With align=something, \framed is a
\vbox, so you can have line breaks.
Thank you, it’s wikified. (Command reference on \setupframed)
Thank you very much. That completely clarifies it.
Hans van der Meer
On 5 jul. 2012, at 12:55, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Meer, H. van der wrote:
Indeed, the align does the trick. But what is the raison d'être of coupling the
behaviour of \\ to the align parameter? I wouldn't
On Jul 5, 2012, at 1:23 AM, luigi scarso wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Rogers, Michael K
mrog...@emory.edumailto:mrog...@emory.edu wrote:
XML documents should form a tree, so a structure like
\startA % A
\startB % B
\stopA % /A
\stopB % /B
won't translate to XML.
Grouping in TeX
Hello!
I just downloaded yesterday night's version of Context and tried the example
provided. - What is wrong with the first line with the \hbox? This stretched
text is as long as the second line and uses the whole text width. The third
line has a width of 10cm as it seems.
Willi
On Jun 28,
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Willi Egger cont...@boede.nl wrote:
Hello!
I just downloaded yesterday night's version of Context and tried the
example provided. - What is wrong with the first line with the \hbox? This
stretched text is as long as the second line and uses the whole text
Am 03.07.2012 um 21:43 schrieb Meer, H. van der:
I do not understand the workings of the itemize.
What I want is two nested itemlists. The outer one unpacked, the inner one
packed. In the inner one the itemlist should be joinedup with the text before
it.
I do not get this working, see the
Thanks. Is the [joinedup] deprecated? Or has it another use?
Hans van der Meer
On 5 jul. 2012, at 20:16, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
You need the “paragraph” option.
\starttext
\setupitemgroup[itemize][1][4,unpacked]
\setupitemgroup[itemize][2][5,packed,paragraph]
I would like to know if there is a command like \tfn{0.9} which would allow
the user to specify an arbitrary font scale factor since the built-in \tfa,
\tfb, \tfc, \tfd, \tfx, and \tfxx are insufficient for one of my projects.
Troy Henderson
On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 10:04 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
\p_mathspacing = \p_math_spacing
I patched math-arr.mkiv, but I am still getting the same error. I don't
know why since I replaced all instances of \p_mathspacing with
\p_math_spacing and deleted the cache in ~/.texmf-var/.
--
Kip Warner --
Am 06.07.2012 um 01:34 schrieb Troy Henderson:
I would like to know if there is a command like \tfn{0.9} which would allow
the user to specify an arbitrary font scale factor since the built-in \tfa,
\tfb, \tfc, \tfd, \tfx, and \tfxx are insufficient for one of my projects.
Am 05.07.2012 um 21:47 schrieb Meer, H. van der:
Thanks. Is the [joinedup] deprecated? Or has it another use?
The “joinedup” option works as intended, the problem in your example is that
the inner itemgroup acts different for the first item.
When you use ”joinedup” context ignores the
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 06:34:40PM -0500, Troy Henderson wrote:
I would like to know if there is a command like \tfn{0.9} which would allow
the
user to specify an arbitrary font scale factor since the built-in \tfa, \tfb,
\
tfc, \tfd, \tfx, and \tfxx are insufficient for one of my projects.
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Kip Warner k...@thevertigo.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 10:04 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
\p_mathspacing = \p_math_spacing
I patched math-arr.mkiv, but I am still getting the same error. I don't
know why since I replaced all instances of \p_mathspacing with
23 matches
Mail list logo
