Re: [NTG-context] Figured bass symbols in a text.
On 10 aug. 2012, at 21:09, 19:59:36, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote
The next beta has:
\starttext
\definelow [MyLow] [style=\txx]
\definehigh [MyHigh] [style=\txx]
\definelowhigh [MyLoHi] [style=\txx]
\definelowmidhigh[MyLoMiHi][style=\txx]
We have
\ruledhbox{\low {L}} and \ruledhbox{\MyLow {L}} and
\ruledhbox{\high{H}} and \ruledhbox{\MyHigh{H}} and
\ruledhbox{\lohi {L}{H}} and \ruledhbox{\MyLoHi {L}{H}} and
\ruledhbox{\lomihi{L}{M}{H}} and \ruledhbox{\MyLoMiHi{L}{M}{H}}.
\stoptext
Hi Hans,
I just tested this for the figured bass symbols in my text. It is perfect.
And it has at least one important advantage over the plain-TeX method, kindly
offered by Michael Rogers, in that it uses the same font as that for he main
text, which, in my case, will be probably a sans-serif font. The plain TeX
solution, as far as I could see, uses only the serif version of LM, so it would
haven given me serif-like figured bass symbols in an otherwise sans-serif
document.
Thank you very much.
Kind regards,
Robert
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Figured bass symbols in a text.
On Aug 12, 2012, at 5:00 AM, Robert Blackstone wrote:
On 10 aug. 2012, at 21:09, 19:59:36, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote
The next beta has:
\starttext
\definelow [MyLow] [style=\txx]
\definehigh [MyHigh] [style=\txx]
\definelowhigh [MyLoHi] [style=\txx]
\definelowmidhigh[MyLoMiHi][style=\txx]
We have
\ruledhbox{\low {L}} and \ruledhbox{\MyLow {L}} and
\ruledhbox{\high{H}} and \ruledhbox{\MyHigh{H}} and
\ruledhbox{\lohi {L}{H}} and \ruledhbox{\MyLoHi {L}{H}} and
\ruledhbox{\lomihi{L}{M}{H}} and \ruledhbox{\MyLoMiHi{L}{M}{H}}.
\stoptext
Hi Hans,
I just tested this for the figured bass symbols in my text. It is perfect.
And it has at least one important advantage over the plain-TeX method, kindly
offered by Michael Rogers, in that it uses the same font as that for he main
text,...
It uses the math font, which is worse. I should have wrapped the arguments
with \hbox and thrown in a \tx or \txx. Or waited a little longer for the good
solution. :)
Best,
Michael
This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
original message (including attachments).
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] formula in TABLE is not continuous numbered
Hi,
please have a look at this minimal example below:
you'll find three formulas (1), (4), (5)
What happen to (2) and (3)?
Steffen
...
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula a+b=c \stopformula
\bTABLE[frame=on,align=right,width=fit,style={\switchtobodyfont[9pt]}]
\bTR
\bTD[width=35mm]
\placeformula
\startformula c-a=b
\stopformula
\eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
\placeformula \startformula c-b=a \stopformula
\stoptext
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] formula in TABLE is not continuous numbered
Am 12.08.2012 um 21:48 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.de:
Hi,
please have a look at this minimal example below:
you'll find three formulas (1), (4), (5)
What happen to (2) and (3)?
Steffen
...
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula a+b=c \stopformula
\bTABLE[frame=on,align=right,width=fit,style={\switchtobodyfont[9pt]}]
\bTR
\bTD[width=35mm]
\placeformula
\startformula c-a=b
\stopformula
\eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
\placeformula \startformula c-b=a \stopformula
\stoptext
It’s a bug in the formula numbering. Natural tables perform three runs on the
table
content to calculate the cell size but formula etc. counters shouldn’t be
increases
in the first two runs.
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] formula in TABLE is not continuous numbered
Am 12.08.2012 um 22:10 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 12.08.2012 um 21:48 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.de:
Hi,
please have a look at this minimal example below:
you'll find three formulas (1), (4), (5)
What happen to (2) and (3)?
Steffen
...
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula a+b=c \stopformula
\bTABLE[frame=on,align=right,width=fit,style={\switchtobodyfont[9pt]}]
\bTR
\bTD[width=35mm]
\placeformula
\startformula c-a=b
\stopformula
\eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
\placeformula \startformula c-b=a \stopformula
\stoptext
It’s a bug in the formula numbering. Natural tables perform three runs on the
table
content to calculate the cell size but formula etc. counters shouldn’t be
increases
in the first two runs.
great, yet another bug hunted!
and what can be done (on the short-run) to avoid increasing?
is there a handy command to manually count down by two?
steffen
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] Bold math trouble
Hi.
I use ConTeXt in Debian. If this helps, please keep it in mind:
dpkg -l context gives:
ii context 2012.05.30.20120611-1
Now, if you consider the following:
code
\usetypescript[palatino][texnansi]
\definetypeface[mainface][mm][math][modern][modern][encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [boldmath] [mm] [boldmath] [modern] [modern] [encoding=texnansi]
\switchtobodyfont[palatino,14pt]
\starttext
Hi
\startformula
x = \boldsymbol{\Sigma}\Sigma
\stopformula
\stoptext
/code
The issue I have is that this doesn't work, and throws me:
! Math formula deleted: Insufficient symbol fonts.
\mathboldsymbol ...t]$\mathsurround \zeropoint #1$
}} {\hbox {\switchtoformul...
l.9 x = \boldsymbol{\Sigma}
\Sigma
However, if I make the 14pt above 11pt or 12pt, it works perfectly. Is
there something I am doing wrong?
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] formula in TABLE is not continuous numbered
Am 12.08.2012 um 22:19 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.de:
Am 12.08.2012 um 22:10 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 12.08.2012 um 21:48 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.de:
Hi,
please have a look at this minimal example below:
you'll find three formulas (1), (4), (5)
What happen to (2) and (3)?
Steffen
...
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula a+b=c \stopformula
\bTABLE[frame=on,align=right,width=fit,style={\switchtobodyfont[9pt]}]
\bTR
\bTD[width=35mm]
\placeformula
\startformula c-a=b
\stopformula
\eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
\placeformula \startformula c-b=a \stopformula
\stoptext
It’s a bug in the formula numbering. Natural tables perform three runs on
the table
content to calculate the cell size but formula etc. counters shouldn’t be
increases
in the first two runs.
great, yet another bug hunted!
and what can be done (on the short-run) to avoid increasing?
is there a handy command to manually count down by two?
You can replace
\placeformula
with
\doifnotmode{*trialtypesetting}\placeformula
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] formula in TABLE is not continuous numbered
Am 12.08.2012 um 22:33 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 12.08.2012 um 22:19 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.de:
Am 12.08.2012 um 22:10 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 12.08.2012 um 21:48 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.de:
Hi,
please have a look at this minimal example below:
you'll find three formulas (1), (4), (5)
What happen to (2) and (3)?
Steffen
...
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula a+b=c \stopformula
\bTABLE[frame=on,align=right,width=fit,style={\switchtobodyfont[9pt]}]
\bTR
\bTD[width=35mm]
\placeformula
\startformula c-a=b
\stopformula
\eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
\placeformula \startformula c-b=a \stopformula
\stoptext
It’s a bug in the formula numbering. Natural tables perform three runs on
the table
content to calculate the cell size but formula etc. counters shouldn’t be
increases
in the first two runs.
great, yet another bug hunted!
and what can be done (on the short-run) to avoid increasing?
is there a handy command to manually count down by two?
You can replace
\placeformula
with
\doifnotmode{*trialtypesetting}\placeformula
Wolfgang
yes we can!
;o)
great, thank you wolfgang
st.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] formula in TABLE is not continuous numbered
On 12-8-2012 22:10, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 12.08.2012 um 21:48 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.de:
Hi,
please have a look at this minimal example below:
you'll find three formulas (1), (4), (5)
What happen to (2) and (3)?
Steffen
...
\starttext
\placeformula \startformula a+b=c \stopformula
\bTABLE[frame=on,align=right,width=fit,style={\switchtobodyfont[9pt]}]
\bTR
\bTD[width=35mm]
\placeformula
\startformula c-a=b
\stopformula
\eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
\placeformula \startformula c-b=a \stopformula
\stoptext
It’s a bug in the formula numbering. Natural tables perform three runs on the
table
content to calculate the cell size but formula etc. counters shouldn’t be
increases
in the first two runs.
It's always hard to predict side effects (as we can have more data being
involved; also. not incrementing will give the wrong number and
therefore the wrong size calculations. Something like the following can
be used for testing:
\let\strc_formulas_handle_numbering_indeed
\strc_formulas_handle_numbering
\let\strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering_indeed\strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering
\let\strc_formulas_handle_sub_number_indeed
\strc_formulas_handle_sub_number
\def\strc_formulas_handle_numbering
{\iftrialtypesetting
\strc_counters_save\v!formula
\strc_formulas_handle_numbering_indeed
\strc_counters_restore\v!formula
\else
\strc_formulas_handle_numbering_indeed
\fi}
\def\strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering
{\iftrialtypesetting
\strc_counters_save\v!formula
\strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering
\strc_counters_restore\v!formula
\else
\strc_formulas_handle_sub_numbering
\fi}
\def\strc_formulas_handle_sub_number % sub formulas
{\iftrialtypesetting
\strc_counters_save\v!formula
\strc_formulas_handle_sub_number_indeed
\strc_counters_restore\v!formula
\else
\strc_formulas_handle_sub_number_indeed
\fi}
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Bold math trouble
On 12-8-2012 22:25, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Hi.
I use ConTeXt in Debian. If this helps, please keep it in mind:
dpkg -l context gives:
ii context 2012.05.30.20120611-1
Now, if you consider the following:
code
you can try ad here:
\definebodyfontenvironment[14pt]
\usetypescript[palatino][texnansi]
\definetypeface[mainface][mm][math][modern][modern][encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [boldmath] [mm] [boldmath] [modern] [modern] [encoding=texnansi]
\switchtobodyfont[palatino,14pt]
\starttext
Hi
\startformula
x = \boldsymbol{\Sigma}\Sigma
\stopformula
\stoptext
/code
The issue I have is that this doesn't work, and throws me:
! Math formula deleted: Insufficient symbol fonts.
\mathboldsymbol ...t]$\mathsurround \zeropoint #1$
}} {\hbox {\switchtoformul...
l.9 x = \boldsymbol{\Sigma}
\Sigma
However, if I make the 14pt above 11pt or 12pt, it works perfectly. Is
there something I am doing wrong?
maybe there is no bold math available
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Bold math trouble
Dear Hans,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:41:09AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
you can try ad here:
\definebodyfontenvironment[14pt]
Thanks.
\usetypescript[palatino][texnansi]
\definetypeface[mainface][mm][math][modern][modern][encoding=texnansi]
\definetypeface [boldmath] [mm] [boldmath] [modern] [modern]
[encoding=texnansi]
\switchtobodyfont[palatino,14pt]
\starttext
Hi
\startformula
x = \boldsymbol{\Sigma}\Sigma
\stopformula
\stoptext
/code
The issue I have is that this doesn't work, and throws me:
! Math formula deleted: Insufficient symbol fonts.
\mathboldsymbol ...t]$\mathsurround \zeropoint #1$
}} {\hbox
{\switchtoformul...
l.9 x = \boldsymbol{\Sigma}
\Sigma
However, if I make the 14pt above 11pt or 12pt, it works perfectly. Is
there something I am doing wrong?
maybe there is no bold math available
I see. In other words, you are saying that I don't have the fonts to
generate bold math at those sizes?
I'll settle with a workaround without bold math for now, then.
Thanks!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
