Re: [NTG-context] mathcases look different in mathalign and formula

2013-04-05 Thread Tobias Columbus
Hi Hans, A few days ago, I started a similar thread on the Lucida mailing list at TUG. Karl Berry said that they'd discuss and look for a method to achieve a consistent look of braces in Lucida. Thanks for telling about the strut=no option. I'll try it this weekend, but I think it will solve my

Re: [NTG-context] math: ± and ∓ are shifted

2013-04-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 4/5/2013 2:16 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote: On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:55:40AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: On 4/5/2013 12:13 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Hans Hagen wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:44 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Xenia wrote: Hi context list, I noticed

Re: [NTG-context] mathcases look different in mathalign and formula

2013-04-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 4/5/2013 8:46 AM, Tobias Columbus wrote: Hi Hans, A few days ago, I started a similar thread on the Lucida mailing list at TUG. Karl Berry said that they'd discuss and look for a method to achieve a consistent look of braces in Lucida. Thanks for telling about the strut=no option. I'll try

Re: [NTG-context] Setupparagraphnumbering

2013-04-05 Thread Diego Depaoli
2013/4/4 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com: Am 04.04.2013 um 13:48 schrieb Diego Depaoli trebes...@gmail.com: [...] It works with the current betty in the context suite but I can’t speak about texlive. I confirm, it works in current, it doesn't in texlive Many thanks -- Diego

Re: [NTG-context] Resetting enumeration numbers

2013-04-05 Thread Otared Kavian
On 4 avr. 2013, at 23:13, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: […] \defineenumeration[test] \setupenumeration[test][way=bysection] ^ This should rather be \setupenumerations[test][way=bysection] Best regards: OK \starttext \startsection[title=one]

Re: [NTG-context] Resetting enumeration numbers

2013-04-05 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 05.04.2013 um 11:31 schrieb Otared Kavian ota...@gmail.com: On 4 avr. 2013, at 23:13, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: […] \defineenumeration[test] \setupenumeration[test][way=bysection] ^ This should rather be

[NTG-context] TeX Live 2013 --- until when can we work on the man pages?

2013-04-05 Thread Sietse Brouwer
Hello all, I didn't get around to working on the man pages these past 2 weeks. Now, I just saw this timing plan on the TeX Live website: http://www.tug.org/texlive/ March 27: sources committed, builds begin. April 8: tlnet (and TL'12) frozen, tlpretest starts, CTAN updates continue there. May

Re: [NTG-context] TeX Live 2013 --- until when can we work on the man pages?

2013-04-05 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
Does this mean any improvements to the man pages should be in on April 8; or that you want them May 20; or has the deadline already passed and are any improvements due next year? Mojca, perhaps you know this? The tlnet freeze means that there won't be any updates to TeX Live 2012 from that

Re: [NTG-context] TeX Live 2013 --- until when can we work on the man pages?

2013-04-05 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Sietse Brouwer wrote: Hello all, I didn't get around to working on the man pages these past 2 weeks. Now, I just saw this timing plan on the TeX Live website: http://www.tug.org/texlive/ March 27: sources committed, builds begin. April 8: tlnet (and TL'12)

Re: [NTG-context] Resetting enumeration numbers

2013-04-05 Thread Otared Kavian
On 5 avr. 2013, at 14:48, Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote: Am 05.04.2013 um 11:31 schrieb Otared Kavian ota...@gmail.com: On 4 avr. 2013, at 23:13, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: […] \defineenumeration[test] \setupenumeration[test][way=bysection]

Re: [NTG-context] TeX Live 2013 --- until when can we work on the man pages?

2013-04-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 4/5/2013 2:57 PM, Sietse Brouwer wrote: I didn't get around to working on the man pages these past 2 weeks. Now, I just saw this timing plan on the TeX Live website: http://www.tug.org/texlive/ No hurry with that ... it's not like context users are using those pages frequently. Lets's

[NTG-context] [wiki] fake account spam

2013-04-05 Thread Philipp Gesang
Hi all, I’d like to draw your attention to the wiki. The spammers appear to know the solution to the current entry barrier “What is usually the last command in a ConTeXt source file (without the backslash)?”, and the number of fake accounts is growing fast:

Re: [NTG-context] math: ± and ∓ are shifted

2013-04-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 4/5/2013 9:32 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 4/5/2013 2:16 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote: On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:55:40AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: On 4/5/2013 12:13 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Hans Hagen wrote: On 4/4/2013 11:44 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Thu, 4 Apr 2013,

Re: [NTG-context] [wiki] fake account spam

2013-04-05 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Philipp Gesang wrote: Hi all, I’d like to draw your attention to the wiki. The spammers appear to know the solution to the current entry barrier “What is usually the last command in a ConTeXt source file (without the backslash)?”, and the number of fake

Re: [NTG-context] Resetting enumeration numbers

2013-04-05 Thread Willi Egger
Thank you folks! about the synchronization I did not write, but in my case there was also something with interference when using subsubject paragraphs inside a section, then the counter was reset although I had set the way=bysection... I will now donwload the latest beta and see Thanks!

Re: [NTG-context] [wiki] fake account spam

2013-04-05 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
3.) Install something like http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:ConfirmAccount and/or maybe use both captcha and some context-specific question Adding an actual captcha seems like the way to go; it may not prevent all automated account creations, but it clearly filters much better than a

Re: [NTG-context] Resetting enumeration numbers

2013-04-05 Thread Willi Egger
Great! It works now as expected. Thank you Hans for the fix! Willi On Apr 5, 2013, at 4:08 PM, Willi Egger wrote: Thank you folks! about the synchronization I did not write, but in my case there was also something with interference when using subsubject paragraphs inside a section, then

Re: [NTG-context] [wiki] fake account spam

2013-04-05 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 15:59:47 +0200 Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote: some context-specific question (honestly: if users don't know how to answer some slightly more tricky question, they shouldn't be able to get the account). We could use questions like Last name of president

[NTG-context] \setcharacterspacing[frenchpunctuation] not working

2013-04-05 Thread Peter Münster
Hi, With the latest beta, \setcharacterspacing[frenchpunctuation] is no more working. Example: --8---cut here---start-8--- \setcharacterspacing[frenchpunctuation] \starttext bla: bla \stoptext --8---cut here---end---8---

Re: [NTG-context] \setcharacterspacing[frenchpunctuation] not working

2013-04-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 4/5/2013 6:21 PM, Peter Münster wrote: Hi, With the latest beta, \setcharacterspacing[frenchpunctuation] is no more working. ah, side effect of optimization with an undefined var ... fixed in next upload -

[NTG-context] Running heads, American style.

2013-04-05 Thread john Culleton
Since I spent the better part of two days puzzling over this simple task I thought I would share. The American style for running heads for non-fiction books is to have the current chapter on the left (verso) page and the current section on the right (recto) page. The text for each is near the

Re: [NTG-context] Running heads, American style.

2013-04-05 Thread Mica Semrick
Hi John, Perhaps http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/setupheadertexts will be of some help? Though, the wiki page does not list the [text] argument in your second command. I'm not sure that ConTeXt sees recto and verso, as the wiki page talks of even and odd pages. HTH, Mica On Fri, Apr 5,

Re: [NTG-context] [wiki] fake account spam

2013-04-05 Thread Leo Arnold
On 04/05/2013 04:09 PM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: Adding an actual captcha seems like the way to go; it may not prevent all automated account creations, but it clearly filters much better than a static list of questions with plain-text answers. ... or have them write a letter of motivation