Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Meeting #7

On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Leo Arnold wrote: > Hey Mojca, > > I guess DANTE discount will do. Yes, but ConTeXt Group is definitely cooler, if nothing else, because it's smaller and every member counts. The membership nr. 1 has been sold for 120 EUR! > But if it was possible, i'd join them

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Meeting #7

Hey Mojca, I guess DANTE discount will do. But if it was possible, i'd join them all and come for free :-P Best Leo On 05/11/2013 11:56 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Leo Arnold wrote: Hi there, will the registration open before the end of early bird discount?

Re: [NTG-context] ConTeXt Meeting #7

On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Leo Arnold wrote: > Hi there, > > will the registration open before the end of early bird discount? The dates were most probably copied from the website of meeting in 2010. Jano promised to fix the page in the following days, so no worries - the early bird discoun

[NTG-context] ConTeXt Meeting #7

Hi there, will the registration open before the end of early bird discount? Cheers Leo ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http:/

Re: [NTG-context] Arabic typesetting, one more

Salaam, Huseyin, I missed this and other threads, it's been busy here... On Tue, 07 May 2013 23:35:25 -0600, H. Özoguz wrote: But with traditionalarabic it is worse than with arabtype. What could be a way to fix this? Traditional Arabic is a uniscribe-compliant font, but not a fully openty

Re: [NTG-context] python parse/formatter example on the wiki

Yes, it is solved. On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Wolfgang Schuster < schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Am 11.05.2013 um 16:22 schrieb seasoul : > > > I was trying the example of "writing a parse/formatter" under "Verbatim > text". > > > > The python formatter runs successfully. But wh

Re: [NTG-context] python parse/formatter example on the wiki

Am 11.05.2013 um 16:22 schrieb seasoul : > I was trying the example of "writing a parse/formatter" under "Verbatim text". > > The python formatter runs successfully. But when I compile the text file with > all the definitions included, an error occurs. > > > > } > > \endgroup > \buff_verba

Re: [NTG-context] authoring for web and print - suggestions

2013/5/11 Norbert Preining : > Does anyone have experience with authoring for web and print. I.e., > we want to maintain only one format and generate both web pages and > printed documentation from it. Is there intrinsic or through addons > support in ConteXt for this? Consider pandoc. But you pro

[NTG-context] python parse/formatter example on the wiki

I was trying the example of "writing a parse/formatter" under "Verbatim text". The python formatter runs successfully. But when I compile the text file with all the definitions included, an error occurs. } \endgroup \buff_verbatim_type_block_verbatim_indeed ...ines \dostoptagged \csname

Re: [NTG-context] authoring for web and print - suggestions

On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 5/11/2013 2:47 PM, Grant Rettke wrote: > >> http://www.leverkruid.eu/**context/index.html >> >> Looks really interesting. >> > > Don't go that route ... it's mkii based and overloads low level con

Re: [NTG-context] authoring for web and print - suggestions

On 5/11/2013 2:47 PM, Grant Rettke wrote: http://www.leverkruid.eu/context/index.html Looks really interesting. Don't go that route ... it's mkii based and overloads low level context commands (which even for that approach is not needed). It's far more convenient to use mkiv's tree based xml

Re: [NTG-context] authoring for web and print - suggestions

http://www.leverkruid.eu/context/index.html Looks really interesting. On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Ondřej Hošek wrote: > On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz > wrote: > > I think the most natural route would be to author your content in generic > > xml. This can be wonderfull

Re: [NTG-context] authoring for web and print - suggestions

On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: > I think the most natural route would be to author your content in generic > xml. This can be wonderfully processed in ConTeXt The relevant manual section [1] seems to be the authoritative document on this, though I don't know how up-to-d

Re: [NTG-context] Formulas in ConTeXt are different from those in plain TeX

On 5/11/2013 12:16 PM, Tim Li wrote: > Thanks, Hans, > > can you give me a small example or show me how to do that? I really > don't know how to do that. :-( see plain.tex and the tex book but you can bet on interference ... deep down, math in context is implemented in a rather special way and

Re: [NTG-context] authoring for web and print - suggestions

On 05/11/2013 12:26 PM, Norbert Preining wrote: Does anyone have experience with authoring for web and print. I.e., we want to maintain only one format and generate both web pages and printed documentation from it. Is there intrinsic or through addons support in ConteXt for this? Any suggestion

[NTG-context] authoring for web and print - suggestions

Dear all, this time I have a question not concerning how to ship ConTeXt in Debian or so, but very different. Does anyone have experience with authoring for web and print. I.e., we want to maintain only one format and generate both web pages and printed documentation from it. Is there intrinsic o

Re: [NTG-context] Formulas in ConTeXt are different from those in plain TeX

On 5/11/2013 1:57 AM, Tim Li wrote: Hi, I have asked this question on tex.stackexchange.com http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/113592/formulas-in-context-are-different-from-those-in-plain-tex/113609?noredirect=1#comment250549_113609 as the title said, formulas typeset by ConTeXt are diff