Re: [NTG-context] interaction strangeness
Nope..was sleeping. Just woke… __martin On 8 Dec 2013, at 19:55, Jan Tosovsky wrote: > On 2013-12-06 H. van der Meer wrote: >> Some further experimentation: interchanging two chapters makes the >> problem go away. >> >> It is reproducible, because putting the chapters back als brings the >> problem back. Even stranger, sitting at chapter 5 it kills the >> interaction for chapter 6 and 8, leaving the interactivity for the >> intervening and later chapters intact. >> >> Addition of content to the start of chapter 5 helped for chapter 6 but >> not for chapter 8, which seems strange. >> Addition of content to the end of chapter 5 also helped for chapter 6 >> >> Addition of content to the start of chapter 7 did help to solve for >> chapter 8. >> >> So I fear it has in some way to do with the moment the output routine >> is >> called in relation to the reference processing in >> \startchapter[title=,reference=]. > > This topic was discussed few weeks ago without clear conclusion: > http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2013/075988.html > > In my case most of cases were resolved when I changed > \placebookmarks[chapter, section] just to \placebookmarks[chapter] > Although few cases still remain, it is much better now. > > When the particular item doesn't react via bookmark, it doesn't react also > via ToC. > > I plan to prepare an example for this, but for me it is not so urgent issue. > > Jan > > ___ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the > Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net > archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ___ ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] [***SPAM***] Incorrect internal font processing
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 09:19:26PM +0100, Jan Tosovsky wrote: > On 2013-12-01 Khaled Hosny wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 11:21:30AM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote: > > > > Interestingly, after I patched Sorts Mill (a FontForge fork) to avoid > > duplicates[1] I ended up with a ‘dotlessi.sc’ glyph, as it turns out > > the font has a → later on, so that is > > where FontLab gets the glyph name, too. > > > > I’ll try to port this patch to LuaTeX later. > > Thanks for handling this! > > When can I expect this fix in luatex.dll updated on my local machine > using the first-setup script? I pushed the patch to LuaTeX trunk, so it should be in the next release, but no idea about which or when. Regards, Khaled ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] [***SPAM***] Incorrect internal font processing
On 2013-12-01 Khaled Hosny wrote: > On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 11:21:30AM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote: > > Interestingly, after I patched Sorts Mill (a FontForge fork) to avoid > duplicates[1] I ended up with a ‘dotlessi.sc’ glyph, as it turns out > the font has a → later on, so that is > where FontLab gets the glyph name, too. > > I’ll try to port this patch to LuaTeX later. Thanks for handling this! When can I expect this fix in luatex.dll updated on my local machine using the first-setup script? Will it be in any following minor 0.77 update or in 0.80 later this year? Jan Btw, FontForge could be patched as well ;-) ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] interaction strangeness
On 2013-12-06 H. van der Meer wrote: > Some further experimentation: interchanging two chapters makes the > problem go away. > > It is reproducible, because putting the chapters back als brings the > problem back. Even stranger, sitting at chapter 5 it kills the > interaction for chapter 6 and 8, leaving the interactivity for the > intervening and later chapters intact. > > Addition of content to the start of chapter 5 helped for chapter 6 but > not for chapter 8, which seems strange. > Addition of content to the end of chapter 5 also helped for chapter 6 > > Addition of content to the start of chapter 7 did help to solve for > chapter 8. > > So I fear it has in some way to do with the moment the output routine > is > called in relation to the reference processing in > \startchapter[title=,reference=]. This topic was discussed few weeks ago without clear conclusion: http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2013/075988.html In my case most of cases were resolved when I changed \placebookmarks[chapter, section] just to \placebookmarks[chapter] Although few cases still remain, it is much better now. When the particular item doesn't react via bookmark, it doesn't react also via ToC. I plan to prepare an example for this, but for me it is not so urgent issue. Jan ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
