On 4/17/2014 2:51 AM, Rik Kabel wrote:
It appears that descriptions generate a spurious
Missing character: There is no ^@ (U+) in font lmroman12-regular!
log message. MWE:
\definedescription[oops][]
\starttext
\oops{Where}is the U+?
\stoptext
The messages appears i
Am 2014-04-16 um 10:22 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm :
>
> Am 2014-04-16 um 09:45 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm :
>
>> Unfortunately Ladoga and Quant lack the Kyrgyz and Kasakh glyphs that I need.
>
> That’s wrong - I looked only at the preview picture at Paratype’s. Myfonts
> shows the whole imp
It appears that descriptions generate a spurious
Missing character: There is no ^@ (U+) in font lmroman12-regular!
log message. MWE:
\definedescription[oops][]
\starttext
\oops{Where}is the U+?
\stoptext
The messages appears in the log once for each description in the do
It seems a few examples from the columns manual --
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/columns.pdf -- are broken.
Here is another (from page 34):
\definecolumnset[example][n=3]
\definecolumnset[therest][n=4]
\setupcolumnset[example]
\setupcolumnset[therest] [distance=.5cm] [distance=.5cm]
\s
Am 16.04.2014 um 20:16 schrieb Fabrice Couvreur :
> Hi,
> How do the two figures are side by side ?
Each object in a combination consists of two object, (1) the image etc. and (2)
the caption but in your example you have only one object where the figure acts
as caption.
\startcombination[…]
Hi,
How do the two figures are side by side ?
\setupTABLE[row][1,2][width=1.5cm,align={middle,lohi}]
\setupTABLE[c][1][width=3cm,align={middle,lohi}]
\starttext
\startcombination[2*1]
{%
\bTABLE[align={middle,lohi}]
\bTR\bTD{}\eTD\bTD{$A$}\eTD\bTD{$\overline{A}$}\eTD\bTD{Total}\eTD\eTR
\bTR\bTD{$B
Hi,
According to the columns manual, the following should produce a
two-column layout with the first column being 1/3 and the second
column being 2/3 the makeupwidth:
\definecolumnset[example][n=2]
\setupcolumnset[example][1][width=.33\makeupwidth]
\starttext
\startcolumnset[example]
\dorec
On 04/16/2014 01:55 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I would suggest dropping support for linux-ppc for the ConTeXt
distribution unless somebody objects.
Hi Mojca,
AFAIK, I'm one of the two people who used linux-ppc, but that machine is
no longer used as a desktop, so that's completely fine by me. A
Hi,
I would suggest dropping support for linux-ppc for the ConTeXt
distribution unless somebody objects.
I'm surprised about the number of ppc users on Mac (and would be
curious to get more off-list feedback from those still using it). TeX
Live planned to drop support this year, but it seems that