Hi Dillon
There is also a purely plaintex solutions for example:
% Here is Peter Olsak solution (see TBN:
ftp://math.feld.cvut.cz/olsak/tbn/tbn.pdf - czech only)
\def\terminator{*}
\def\usethereadvalues{}
\newcount\tempnum
\def\readparameters{\tempnum=0\let\next=\readonlyone \next}
\def\read
hi,ℤh𝕚chu ℂh𝕖n
Thanks! I will check it later!
Best Regards
Dillon
2015-07-05 11:40 GMT+08:00 Zhichu Chen :
> Hi Dillon,
>
> First of all, I'm against defining such a complex macro, since that can be
> very
> confusing when you use it. I personal prefer the key-value definition:
> \def\DEFINET
Hi Dillon,
First of all, I'm against defining such a complex macro, since that can
be very
confusing when you use it. I personal prefer the key-value definition:
\def\DEFINETEST[#1]{%
\getXXXparameters
[paraA=defaultValueForParameterA%
,paraB=% or just empty
,#1]%
\doSomethingWi
hi, all
For testing, I have a definition:
\define[9]\DEFINETEST{#1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9}
context test can work fine, when I modify the above into:
\define[10]\DEFINETEST{#1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9,#10}
I got a error:
test.tex: ! Illegal parameter number in definition of \DEFINETEST
>From
hi, Han and Pablo
Thank you very much!
I finally asked the question and got the answer,
http://tex.stackexchange.com/q/253575/81323,
I hope you two help me check it, whether my solution is right direction?
And I copied all my resolution here:
I found context refer manual 11.3 Variations in
On Fri, 3 Jul 2015 19:19:58 +0200
Hans Hagen wrote:
> (i'm pretty sure that context was one of the first to support for
> instance field (widget) trees but support for that in viewers changes
> each version so one never knows what is the right way as specs
> predate support in viewers)
>
> (in
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\setupxtable[frame=on, option=stretch]
\setupxtable[name][foregroundstyle=\bfc, ny=3, align=lohi]
\setupxtable[cv][foregroundstyle=\em, ny=2, align=bottom]
\setupxtable[contact][foregroundstyle=\em, align=flushright]
\starttext
\startxtable
\startxrow
On 07/04/2015 01:45 AM, 土卜皿 wrote:
> After reading something, I think the red area belonging to top area,
> but there is no "definetop" or like this, my understanding is right?
Hi Dillon,
do you text the text heading or also the red line from your attached image?
Pablo
> 2015-07-03 22:32 GMT
On 7/4/2015 1:45 AM, 土卜皿 wrote:
After reading something, I think the red area belonging to top area,
but there is no "definetop" or like this, my understanding is right?
you can find examples of adding such shapes in the metafun manual
it boils down to putting the text in a \framed and giving