Re: [NTG-context] Troubles installing on windows

2016-03-24 Thread adrian
Hans Hagen wxs.nl> writes: > > On 12/24/2015 5:28 PM, Vya. Y. wrote: > > > looks like a new binary and old context .. .maybe something went > > wrong in the update? Hans > > > > Thank you, Hans. Where can I download the latest ConTeXt, with Windows > > binaries? I cannot find it on Pragma Ade

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

2016-03-24 Thread Hans Hagen
On 3/15/2016 8:09 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:10:27 +0100 "Thomas A. Schmitz" wrote: But don't let anyone tell you that explicit names are "antiquated." They make TeX or xml source documents so much more readable! And when you have to retrace five levels of \startsectionleve

Re: [NTG-context] Are nested sections possible?

2016-03-24 Thread Hans Hagen
On 3/15/2016 6:10 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On 03/15/2016 05:54 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: Indeed, Hans, it would be nice to be able to nest sectionlevels within a chapter...section... scheme (which is NOT depreciated, although antiquated). Oooh, shiny! In the TEI community, there are also peo

Re: [NTG-context] Length range control of the last line of paragraph

2016-03-24 Thread Hans Hagen
On 3/24/2016 8:36 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote: On 2016-03-24 Hans Hagen wrote: On 3/23/2016 8:14 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote: On 2016-03-22 Hans Hagen wrote: On 3/22/2016 9:57 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote: On 2016-03-22 Hans Hagen wrote: On 3/21/2016 8:14 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote: when paragraphs are separa

Re: [NTG-context] Length range control of the last line of paragraph

2016-03-24 Thread Jan Tosovsky
On 2016-03-24 Hans Hagen wrote: > On 3/23/2016 8:14 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote: > > On 2016-03-22 Hans Hagen wrote: > >> On 3/22/2016 9:57 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote: > >>> On 2016-03-22 Hans Hagen wrote: > On 3/21/2016 8:14 PM, Jan Tosovsky wrote: > > > > when paragraphs are separated by inde

Re: [NTG-context] metafun

2016-03-24 Thread Hans Hagen
On 3/24/2016 6:24 PM, Piotr Kopszak wrote: P.S. For your conveniance, the minimal example: \startMPpositiongraphic{mypos:arrow} pair c[] ; initialize_box(\MPpos{\MPvar{self}}); c[1] := cxy ; initialize_box(\MPpos{\MPvar{to}}); c[2] := cxy ; drawarrow c[1] -- c[2] withpen

Re: [NTG-context] metafun

2016-03-24 Thread luigi scarso
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Piotr Kopszak wrote: > P.S. > > For your conveniance, the minimal example: > > \startMPpositiongraphic{mypos:arrow} >pair c[] ; >initialize_box(\MPpos{\MPvar{self}}); >c[1] := cxy ; >initialize_box(\MPpos{\MPvar{to}}); >c[2] := cxy ; >drawa

Re: [NTG-context] metafun

2016-03-24 Thread Piotr Kopszak
P.S. For your conveniance, the minimal example: \startMPpositiongraphic{mypos:arrow} pair c[] ; initialize_box(\MPpos{\MPvar{self}}); c[1] := cxy ; initialize_box(\MPpos{\MPvar{to}}); c[2] := cxy ; drawarrow c[1] -- c[2] withpen pencircle scaled 2bp ; \stopMPpositiongraphic \sta

Re: [NTG-context] metafun

2016-03-24 Thread Piotr Kopszak
Hello list, The solution shown here no longer works with recent beta (indeed, it probably ceased to work some time ago). How should it be corrected? Best Piotr 2010-10-24 0:14 GMT+02:00 Aditya Mahajan : > On Sat, 23 Oct 2010, Herbert Voss wrote: > >> It is a hard job to understand how all works

Re: [NTG-context] Why does 0.0001pt make such a big difference?

2016-03-24 Thread Hans Hagen
On 3/24/2016 8:58 AM, Peter Münster wrote: Hi, Please compare \setupwhitespace[0.0001pt plus 2ex] with \setupwhitespace[0pt plus 2ex] here: \showframe \setuphead[section][style={\switchtobodyfont[72pt]}] \setupalign[height] \setupwhitespace[0.0001pt plus 2ex] % desired result %\setupwhitespace

Re: [NTG-context] Length range control of the last line of paragraph

2016-03-24 Thread Hans Hagen
On 3/24/2016 3:10 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Tue, 22 Mar 2016, Hans Hagen wrote: a next beta will provide three new keywords (related to n times parindent filling, fwiw) \startnarrower[left] \setupalign[four] 4>\the\parfillskip \ward \par \stopnarrower \startnarrower[left] \setupali

[NTG-context] Why does 0.0001pt make such a big difference?

2016-03-24 Thread Peter Münster
Hi, Please compare \setupwhitespace[0.0001pt plus 2ex] with \setupwhitespace[0pt plus 2ex] here: \showframe \setuphead[section][style={\switchtobodyfont[72pt]}] \setupalign[height] \setupwhitespace[0.0001pt plus 2ex] % desired result %\setupwhitespace[0pt plus 2ex] % "plus 2ex" is unused \s