Re: [NTG-context] Strange numbers appear (when figures are moved in columnsets)

2016-12-28 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
Sorry for the noise. Adding \usemodule[newcolumnsets] makes the numbers go away. /Mikael On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > Hi! > > The example below gives strange numbers (4110) and (1410) in the pdf > file, and the latter one kicks me out of the

[NTG-context] Strange numbers appear (when figures are moved in columnsets)

2016-12-28 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
Hi! The example below gives strange numbers (4110) and (1410) in the pdf file, and the latter one kicks me out of the grid. Is this a bug? /Mikael (yes, I'm using a late standalone) %% start of example \setuplayout[ grid=yes, ] \showgrid \definecolumnset[example][n=2] \starttext

Re: [NTG-context] integral symbol

2016-12-28 Thread Hans Hagen
On 12/28/2016 6:14 PM, Alan Braslau wrote: Hi Hans, Hi list, This is similar to what we have discussed earlier on this list and elsewhere regarding \over vs. \frac. (I agree with Knuth that {a \over b} is *much* more readable in running source code than \frac{a}{b} but have resigned myself to

Re: [NTG-context] integral symbol

2016-12-28 Thread Alan Braslau
Hi Hans, Hi list, This is similar to what we have discussed earlier on this list and elsewhere regarding \over vs. \frac. (I agree with Knuth that {a \over b} is *much* more readable in running source code than \frac{a}{b} but have resigned myself to use \frac{}{}, as this can be made better

[NTG-context] new xml feature (for html lovers)

2016-12-28 Thread Hans Hagen
Hi, As a side effect of a fun project I've added css like selectors to the xml interface, so one can do: \xmlall{#1}{{foo bar .whatever, bar foo .whatever}} \starttext \startbuffer[selector-003] title 1 title 1.1 title 2 title 2.1 title 3 title 3.1 title 4

Re: [NTG-context] integral symbol

2016-12-28 Thread Hans Hagen
On 12/28/2016 2:02 PM, Fabrice Couvreur wrote: Hi Henri, Thank you for your suggestion. The problem with integrals is that they don't adapt because they are not wrapped as delimiters (like left/right stuff). If \int were a command taking an argument it would be easier. As in: \starttext

Re: [NTG-context] integral symbol

2016-12-28 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
Hi Henri, Thank you for your suggestion. Fabrice 2016-12-28 12:19 GMT+01:00 Henri Menke : > On 12/28/2016 11:39 AM, Fabrice Couvreur wrote: > > Hello, > > The integral symbol is little in inline math mode. Is it possible to > have it bigger ? > > thank you, > > Fabrice > >

Re: [NTG-context] integral symbol

2016-12-28 Thread Henri Menke
On 12/28/2016 11:39 AM, Fabrice Couvreur wrote: > Hello, > The integral symbol is little in inline math mode. Is it possible to have it > bigger ? > thank you, > Fabrice > > \definetypeface [mainface] [rm] >[serif] [palatino][default] [encoding=texnansi] > > \definetypeface [mainface]

Re: [NTG-context] floatcombination alignment has changed?

2016-12-28 Thread Christoph Reller
Dear List, Consider the following MWE: \startplacefigure \startfloatcombination \startplacetable[title={Table I}] % <- shifted %\startplacetable % <- not shifted \bTABLE \bTR \bTD Foo \eTD \bTD Text. \eTD \eTR \eTABLE \stopplacetable

[NTG-context] integral symbol

2016-12-28 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
Hello, The integral symbol is little in inline math mode. Is it possible to have it bigger ? thank you, Fabrice \definetypeface [mainface] [rm] [serif] [palatino][default] [encoding=texnansi] \definetypeface [mainface] [ss] [sans] [helvetica] [default] [encoding=texnansi]