[NTG-context] \overline and \overbar

Dear all, In the following sample, the outputs of \overline and of \overbar are slightly different. I used \overline in LaTeX. But it takes more vertical space that cause the alignment trouble while using \overbar has no problem at all. Is it normal behavior? Thank you. Best regards,

Re: [NTG-context] question about Linux Libertine

thank you for this comprehensive explanation. i digged a little bit in your previous answer, and i found it perfect for using alternative glyphs like oldstyle ones. On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 5/8/2017 12:20 AM, kaddour kardio wrote: > >> i managed to

[NTG-context] bug with en and em dashes

Dear list, using latest beta from 2017.05.09 10:14 with the following sample: \starttext \startTEXpage[offset=1em] -- --- – — \stopTEXpage \stoptext I get as result: -- -- Ligatures aren’t converted and even real en and em dashes are converted to

Re: [NTG-context] BUG: % is comment in btx fields

Am Mon, 8 May 2017 17:56:08 -0600 schrieb Alan Braslau: > So bibtex has a funny way of dealing with comments, and do we really > care about Scribe? biber handles comments differently than bibtex, see e.g. https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/261261/are-comments-discouraged-in-a-bibtex-file