Re: [NTG-context] luatex binary is too old

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 9:12 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On 15 January 2018 at 20:54, luigi scarso wrote: >> Il 15 gen 2018 20:52, "Mojca Miklavec" ha scritto: >> On 15 January 2018 at 15:26, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >>> On 15 January 2018 at 14:56, Hans Hagen wrote:

Re: [NTG-context] Labels and Enumerations

Hans, Even with the local scope, I cannot get multiple enumerations in a paragraph at the same time as I get inright labels in footnotes. The footnote enumerations appear only with display=yes, but that causes paragraph breaks after each enumeration. The default alignment works, but I need

Re: [NTG-context] luatex binary is too old

On 15 January 2018 at 20:54, luigi scarso wrote: > Il 15 gen 2018 20:52, "Mojca Miklavec" ha scritto: > On 15 January 2018 at 15:26, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> On 15 January 2018 at 14:56, Hans Hagen wrote: >>> On 1/15/2018 2:47 PM, Roger Mason wrote: : Your luatex binary is too old,

Re: [NTG-context] luatex binary is too old

Il 15 gen 2018 20:52, "Mojca Miklavec" ha scritto: On 15 January 2018 at 15:26, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On 15 January 2018 at 14:56, Hans Hagen wrote: >> On 1/15/2018 2:47 PM, Roger Mason wrote: >>> >>> : Your luatex binary is too old, you need at least

Re: [NTG-context] luatex binary is too old

On 15 January 2018 at 15:26, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On 15 January 2018 at 14:56, Hans Hagen wrote: >> On 1/15/2018 2:47 PM, Roger Mason wrote: >>> >>> : Your luatex binary is too old, you need at least version 1.05! >>> >>> Where do I get the updated luatex binary? >>> >>> I'm running on

Re: [NTG-context] context tarball distribution?

On 1/15/2018 3:59 PM, Martin Fechner wrote: Dear list, Our slightly paranoid system administrator refuses to pull context via rsync on our development and production hosts. He says there's no protection against someone who may tamper with the data on its transfer like e.g. TLS-protected traffic

Re: [NTG-context] luatex binary is too old

Hans Hagen writes: >> : Your luatex binary is too old, you need at least version 1.05! >> >> Where do I get the updated luatex binary? >> >> I'm running on FreeBSD 10.3, 32 bit. > Does that binary come from the garden too? > > Hans Yes, I did not compile it myself, if that

[NTG-context] context tarball distribution?

Dear list, Our slightly paranoid system administrator refuses to pull context via rsync on our development and production hosts. He says there's no protection against someone who may tamper with the data on its transfer like e.g. TLS-protected traffic via https. So I got the following question

Re: [NTG-context] luatex binary is too old

On 15 January 2018 at 14:56, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 1/15/2018 2:47 PM, Roger Mason wrote: >> >> : Your luatex binary is too old, you need at least version 1.05! >> >> Where do I get the updated luatex binary? >> >> I'm running on FreeBSD 10.3, 32 bit. > > Does that binary come from the garden

Re: [NTG-context] luatex binary is too old

On 1/15/2018 2:47 PM, Roger Mason wrote: Hello, I just updated ConTeXt: context --version resolvers | trees | analyzing 'home:texmf' resolvers | globbing | confusing filename, name: 'README.txt', lower: 'readme.txt', already: 'ReadMe.txt' mtx-context | ConTeXt Process

[NTG-context] luatex binary is too old

Hello, I just updated ConTeXt: context --version resolvers | trees | analyzing 'home:texmf' resolvers | globbing | confusing filename, name: 'README.txt', lower: 'readme.txt', already: 'ReadMe.txt' mtx-context

Re: [NTG-context] Labels and Enumerations

On 1/14/2018 9:37 PM, Rik Kabel wrote: On 2018-01-14 09:46, Hans Hagen wrote: On 1/13/2018 10:17 PM, Rik Kabel wrote: I would like to request the restoration of labels (\definelabel) to full citizenship in MKIV. While enumerations are more flexible in many ways, they cannot replace one