Re: [NTG-context] \setvariables and database module

2018-01-31 Thread Otared Kavian
> On 31 Jan 2018, at 18:11, Wolfgang Schuster > wrote: > >> […] >> Thanks again, but I wonder where did you find this trick?… in i-context.pdf >> there is no entry for \defineseparatedlist… > > setup-en.pdf (and i-context.pdf) contains only commands from the

Re: [NTG-context] \setvariables and database module

2018-01-31 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Otared Kavian 31. Januar 2018 um 17:58 Yes it does the job! Thanks again, but I wonder where did you find this trick?… in i-context.pdf there is no entry for \defineseparatedlist… setup-en.pdf (and i-context.pdf) contains only commands from the core. There are

Re: [NTG-context] \setvariables and database module

2018-01-31 Thread Otared Kavian
> On 31 Jan 2018, at 17:40, Wolfgang Schuster > wrote: > >> […] >> > Add “strip=yes” to remove spaces around the cells. > > \defineseparatedlist > [seplisttalk] > [separator={;}, >command=\maketalk, >strip=yes] > Yes it does the job! Thanks again,

Re: [NTG-context] \setvariables and database module

2018-01-31 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Otared Kavian 30. Januar 2018 um 16:53 Hi again Wolfgang, I think I understood what is going wrong with my example after your hint: I have to remove all spaces around the separator and remove also the braces around each entry. That is the following works fine:

Re: [NTG-context] Expansion help needed, getvariable and TABLE

2018-01-31 Thread Hans Hagen
On 1/31/2018 4:40 PM, Rik Kabel wrote: On 2018-01-31 09:54, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Rik Kabel schrieb: \starttexdefinition doTableRowExpB #SET     \define\A{\getvariable{#SET}{a}}     \define\B{\getvariable{#SET}{b}}     \define\C{\getvariable{#SET}{c}}     \bTR   \expanded{\bTC\A\eTC}    

Re: [NTG-context] Expansion help needed, getvariable and TABLE

2018-01-31 Thread Rik Kabel
On 2018-01-31 09:54, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Rik Kabel schrieb: \starttexdefinition doTableRowExpB #SET     \define\A{\getvariable{#SET}{a}}     \define\B{\getvariable{#SET}{b}}     \define\C{\getvariable{#SET}{c}}     \bTR   \expanded{\bTC\A\eTC}   \expanded{\bTC\B\eTC}  

Re: [NTG-context] Expansion help needed, getvariable and TABLE

2018-01-31 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Rik Kabel schrieb: \starttexdefinition doTableRowExpB #SET \define\A{\getvariable{#SET}{a}} \define\B{\getvariable{#SET}{b}} \define\C{\getvariable{#SET}{c}} \bTR \expanded{\bTC\A\eTC} \expanded{\bTC\B\eTC} \expanded{\bTC\C\eTC} \eTR \stoptexdefinition You

Re: [NTG-context] Expansion help needed, getvariable and TABLE

2018-01-31 Thread Rik Kabel
On 2018-01-31 01:04, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Rik Kabel 31. Januar 2018 um 03:10 Listers, I have a problem, and a question on ConTeXt programming efficiency. In the example below, I have a set of variables. When these are reference directly via

Re: [NTG-context] Spurious space in \definestartstop

2018-01-31 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Henri Menke 30. Januar 2018 um 21:46 On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 21:24 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Henri Menke 30. Januar 2018 um 21:12 On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 11:58 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: On 1/30/2018 11:34 AM, Henri Menke wrote: On 01/30/2018 09:17 PM, Hans

Re: [NTG-context] Question about an environment

2018-01-31 Thread Fabrice Couvreur
Hello, Maybe I have not been clear enough about what I would like to do ? In the first exercise, I get this: *Ex1* BlablaBlablaBlablaBlablaBlablaBlablaBlablaBlabla BlablaBlablaBlablaBlablaBlablaBlablaBlablaBlabla In the second exercise, this: *Ex2* 1. 2. 3. I would like to do this: *Ex2*

Re: [NTG-context] Support for musl

2018-01-31 Thread Hans Hagen
On 1/31/2018 10:26 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: On 30 January 2018 at 00:23, Henri wrote: It looks like we are going to get upstream support for musl from TeX live. There is this extremely long thread on the tlbuild mailing list. https://tug.org/pipermail/tlbuild/2018q1/003972.html Thanks a

Re: [NTG-context] Support for musl

2018-01-31 Thread luigi scarso
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:26 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > - We need "the latest" luatex. (It's not yet clear to me what "the > latest" means at this moment as it's still totally confusing to me and > we didn't configure the other builders yet either. Luigi sent me

Re: [NTG-context] Support for musl

2018-01-31 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On 30 January 2018 at 00:23, Henri wrote: > It looks like we are going to get upstream support for musl from TeX live. > > There is this extremely long thread on the tlbuild mailing list. > https://tug.org/pipermail/tlbuild/2018q1/003972.html Thanks a lot. This *enormously* simplifies things.